Fermat number

Revision as of 17:18, 25 August 2009 by JBL (talk | contribs) (Created page with 'A '''Fermat number''' is a number of the form <math>2^{2^n} + 1</math> where <math>n</math> is a nonnegative integer. The first five Fermat numbers (for <math>n=0,1,2,3,…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

A Fermat number is a number of the form $2^{2^n} + 1$ where $n$ is a nonnegative integer.

The first five Fermat numbers (for $n=0,1,2,3,4$) are \begin{align*} F_0 &= 2^{2^0}+1 = 3\\ F_1 &= 2^{2^1}+1 = 5\\ F_2 &= 2^{2^2}+1 = 17\\ F_3 &= 2^{2^3}+1 = 257\\ F_4 &= 2^{2^4}+1 = 65537. \end{align*} A prime Fermat number is known as a Fermat prime. Each of the first five Fermat numbers is a Fermat prime. Based on these results, one might conjecture (as did Fermat) that all Fermat numbers are prime. However, this fails for $n=5$: $F_5 = 2^{2^5}+1 = 4294967297 = 641 \cdot 6700417$. In fact, the primes listed above are the only Fermat numbers known to be prime. The Fermat number $F_n$ is known to be composite for $5 \leq n \leq 32$.

Relative primality of Fermat numbers

The Fermat numbers $F_m$ and $F_n$ are relatively prime for all $m \neq n$

Proof

We prove that the Fermat numbers satisfy the following recursion, from which the claimed result will follow: for all $n \geq 0$, \[F_{n + 1} = F_0 \cdot F_1 \cdot F_2 \cdots F_n + 2.\]

We proceed by induction. For $n = 0$ we have $F_1 = 5 = 3 + 2 = F_0 + 2$, as desired. Suppose that $F_k = F_0 \cdots F_{k - 1} + 2$. Now observe that \begin{align*} F_{k + 1} & = 2^{2^{k + 1}} + 1 \\ & = \left(\left(2^{2^{k}}\right)^2 + 2 \cdot 2^{2^k} + 1\right) - 2\cdot 2^{2^k} \\ & = (F_k)^2 - 2F_k + 2 \\ & = (F_0 \cdot F_1\cdots F_{k - 1} + 2)\cdot F_k - 2F_k + 2 \\ & = F_0 \cdot F_1 \cdots F_{k - 1} \cdot F_k + 2, \end{align*} as desired.

It follows that if $m < n$ that $\gcd(F_m, F_n) = \gcd(F_m, 2) = 1$, so $F_m$ and $F_n$ are relatively prime, as claimed.

This article is a stub. Help us out by expanding it.