Chebyshev and the history of the Prime Number Theorem

Revision as of 21:48, 10 January 2025 by Ddk001 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "This page is a detailed description of Chebyshev's attempt to prove the prime number theorem, and a bit of the history of the prime number theorem in general. ==Histo...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This page is a detailed description of Chebyshev's attempt to prove the prime number theorem, and a bit of the history of the prime number theorem in general.

History

In 1850, Russian mathematician Pafnuty Lvovich Chebyshev made a major breakthrough by showing a statement that supports the prime number theorem. It states:

"Let $\pi (n)$ denote the number of primes that is less than or equal to $n$.

There exist numbers $c_1$ and $c_2$ such that

\[c_1 \frac{x}{\log{x}} \le \pi (x) \le c_2 \frac{x}{\log{x}}\] "

Additionally, he also showed that if the ratio of $\pi (x)$ and $\frac{x}{\log{x}}$ goes toward a limit as $x \to \infty$, then the limit is $1$. Finally, in 1896, French mathematician Jacques Hadamard and Belgian mathematician Charles-Jean-Gustave-Nicholas de la Vallee-Poussin both (independently) produced a proof of the prime number theorem.

Chebyshev's statement

Let $\pi (n)$ denote the number of primes that is less than or equal to $n$.

There exist numbers $c_1$ and $c_2$ such that

\[c_1 \frac{x}{\log{x}} \le \pi (x) \le c_2 \frac{x}{\log{x}}\]

Proof

Let $p$ be a prime and $n$ be an integer. Since

\[\dbinom{2n}{n} = \frac{(2n)!}{(n!)(n!)}\]

, $p$ divides $\dbinom{2n}{n}$ exactly

\[\sum_{i=1}^{\lfloor \log_{p}{(2n)} \rfloor} (\lfloor \frac{2n}{p^i} \rfloor - 2 \cdot \lfloor \frac{n}{p^i} \rfloor)\]

times.

Therefore, since

\[\lfloor \frac{2n}{p^i} \rfloor - 2 \cdot \lfloor \frac{n}{p^i} \rfloor \le 1\]

, we have

\[\sum_{i=1}^{\lfloor \log_{p}{(2n)} \rfloor} (\lfloor \frac{2n}{p^i} \rfloor - 2 \cdot \lfloor \frac{n}{p^i} \rfloor)\]

\[\le \sum_{i=1}^{\lfloor \log_{p}{(2n)} \rfloor} 1\]

\[=\lfloor \log_{p}{(2n)} \rfloor\]

so if $p^r | \dbinom{2n}{n}$, $p^r \le 2n$

Repeated applications of that gives

\[\dbinom{2n}{n} \le (2n)^{\pi (2n)}\]

Additionally,

\[2^n=\prod_{a=1}^n {2} \le \prod_{a=1}^n {\frac{n+a}{a}} = \frac{(n+1) \cdot (n+2) \cdot \dots \cdot 2n}{n!} = \dbinom{2n}{n} \le \sum_{a=0}^{2n} {\dbinom{2n}{a}} = 2^{2n}\]

so

\[2^n \le (2n)^{\pi (2n)}\]

\[\implies n \cdot \log {2} \le \pi (2n) \cdot \log {2n}\]

\[\implies \pi (2n) \ge \frac{n \cdot \log {2}}{\log {2n}}\]

\[\implies \pi (n) \ge \frac{\log{2}}{2} \cdot \frac{n}{\log {n}}\]

Now, we note also that

\[\prod_{\text{p is a prime from n to 2n}} {p} | \dbinom{2n}{n}\]

so

\[n^{\pi (2n) - \pi (n)}=\prod_{\text{p is a prime from n to 2n}} n < \prod_{\text{p is a prime from n to 2n}} p \le \dbinom{2n}{n} \le 2^{2n}\]

Thus,

\[\pi (2n) - \pi (n) \le \log {4} \cdot \frac{n}{\log {n}}\]

We have

\[\log {2n} \cdot \pi (2n)+\log {n} \cdot \pi (n)= \log {2} \cdot \pi (2n) + \log {n} \cdot (\pi (2n) - \pi (n)) \le \log {2} \cdot \pi (2n) + n \cdot \log {4} \le 3n \cdot \log {2}\]

since $\pi (2n) \le n$ for $n>3$ (because there is at least a half of even numbers).

Repeated addition of that gives

\[\pi (2n) = \frac{1}{\log{2n}} \cdot (\log {2n} \cdot \pi (2n)- \log {n} \cdot \pi (n))+(\log {n} \cdot \pi (n)- \log {\frac{n}{2}} \cdot \pi (\frac{n}{2}))+ (\log {\frac{n}{2}} \cdot \pi (\frac{n}{2})- \log {\frac{n}{4}} \cdot \pi (\frac{n}{4}))+ \dots\]

\[\le \frac{1}{\log {2n}} \cdot (3n \cdot \log {2}+\frac{3n}{2} \cdot \log {2}+\frac{3n}{4} \cdot \log {2}+ \dots)\]

\[= \frac{3n \cdot \log {2}}{\log {2n}} \cdot (1+ \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{4} + \dots)\]

\[= \frac{6n \cdot \log {2}}{\log {2n}}\]

\[\le \frac{\log{64} \cdot n}{\log{n}}\]

As we have previously derived,

\[\pi (2n) - \pi (n) \le \log {4} \cdot \frac{n}{\log {n}}\]

so

\[\frac{\log {x}}{2^m} \cdot \pi (\frac{x}{2^m}) - \frac{\log {x}}{2^{m+1}} \cdot \pi (\frac{x}{2^{m+1}}) = \frac{\log {x}}{2^{m}} (\pi (\frac{x}{2^m})-\pi (\frac{x}{2^{m+1}})) + \frac{\log {x}}{2^{m+1}} \cdot \pi (\frac{x}{2^{m+1}})\]

\[\le \frac{\log {x}}{2^{m}} \cdot \log {4} \cdot \frac{\frac{x}{2^{m+1}}}{\log {\frac{x}{2^{m+1}}}} + \frac{\log {x}}{2^{m+1}} \cdot \frac{\log{64} \cdot \frac{x}{2^{m+2}}}{\log{\frac{x}{2^{m+2}}}}\]

\[\le \frac{\log {x} \cdot \log {4}}{2^{2m+1}} \cdot (\frac{x}{\log {\frac{x}{2^{m+1}}}}+\frac{x}{\log {\frac{x}{2^{m+2}}}})\]

\[\le \frac{\log {x} \cdot \log {4}}{2^{2m}} \cdot \frac{x}{\log {x}- (m+2) \log {2}}\]

\[\le \log {4} \cdot \frac{x}{2^{m}}\]

. (The last step I do not know why. If you can figure out the reason, please add the intermediate steps for it)

If we add that, we get a telescoping sum, so we have

\[\log{x} \cdot \pi (x)  = \sum_{m=0}^{v} (\frac{\log {x}}{2^m} \cdot \pi (\frac{x}{2^m}) - \frac{\log {x}}{2^{m+1}} \cdot \pi (\frac{x}{2^{m+1}}))\]

\[\le \log{4} \cdot x \sum_{m=0}^{v} \frac{1}{2^m}\]

\[\le \log{4} \cdot x\]

\[\implies \pi (x) \le \log {4} \cdot \frac{x}{\log{x}}\]

where $v$ is the greatest integer such a that $2^v | x$.

Collecting our results, we see that

\[\frac{\log{2}}{2} \cdot \frac{n}{\log {n}} \le \pi (x) \le \log {4} \cdot \frac{x}{\log{x}}\]

We have thus found the desired $c_1$ and $c_2$. ~Ddk001 $\blacksquare$

Note: This was actually the same method of proof given by Chebyshev.

See Also