1966 IMO Problems/Problem 3
Prove that the sum of the distances of the vertices of a regular tetrahedron from the center of its circumscribed sphere is less than the sum of the distances of these vertices from any other point in space.
Solution
We will need the following lemma to solve this problem:
Let be a regular tetrahedron, and a point inside it. Let be the distances from to the faces , and . Then, is constant, independent of .
We will compute the volume of in terms of the areas of the faces and the distances from the point to the faces:
because the areas of the four triangles are equal. ( stands for the area of .) Then
This value is constant, so the proof of the lemma is complete.
Let our tetrahedron be , and the center of its circumscribed sphere be . Construct a new regular tetrahedron, , such that the centers of the faces of this tetrahedron are at , , , and .
For any point in ,
with equality only occurring when , , , and are perpendicular to the faces of , meaning that . This completes the proof.
~mathboy100
Remarks (added by pf02, September 2024)
1. The text of the Lemma needed a little improvement, which I did.
2. The Solution above is not complete. It considered only points inside the tetrahedron, but the problem specifically said "any other point in space".
3. I will give another solution below, in which I will address the issue I mentioned in the preceding paragraph.
Solution 2
We will first prove the problem in the 2-dimensional case. We do this to convey the idea of the proof, and because we will use this in one spot in the 3-dimensional case. So let us prove that:
The sum of the distances of the vertices of an equilateral triangle from the center of its circumscribed circle is less than the sum of the distances of these vertices from any other point in the plane.
First, we will show that we can assume that the point is inside the triangle. If the point is outside the triangle, it can be in one of six regions as seen in the pictures below.
TO BE CONTINUED. SAVING MID WAY SO I DON'T LOSE WORK DONE SO FAR.
(Solution by pf02, September 2024)
See Also
1966 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 2 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 4 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |