Normal subgroup
A normal subgroup of a group is a subgroup of for which the relation "" of and is compatible with the law of composition on , which in this article is written multiplicatively. The quotient group of under this relation is often denoted (said, " mod "). (Hence the notation for the integers mod .)
Description
Note that the relation is compatible with right multiplication for any subgroup : for any , On the other hand, if is normal, then the relation must be compatible with left multiplication by any . This is true if and only implies Since any element of can be expressed as , the statement " is normal in " is equivalent to the following statement:
- For all and , ,
which is equivalent to both of the following statements:
- For all , ;
- For all , .
By symmetry, the last condition can be rewritten thus:
- For all , .
Examples
In an Abelian group, every subgroup is a normal subgroup.
Every group is a normal subgroup of itself. Similarly, the trivial group is a subgroup of every group.
Consider the smallest nonabelian group, (the symmetric group on three elements); call its generators and , with , the identity. It has two nontrivial subgroups, the one generated by (isomorphic to and the one generated by (isomorphic to ). Of these, the second is normal but the first is not.
If and are groups, and is a homomorphism of groups, then the inverse image of the identity of under , called the kernel of and denoted , is a normal subgroup of (see the proof of theorem 1 below). In fact, this is a characterization of normal subgroups, for if is a normal subgroup of , the kernel of the canonical homomorphism is .
Note that if is a normal subgroup of and is a normal subgroup of , is not necessarily a normal subgroup of .
Group homomorphism theorems
Theorem 1. An equivalence relation on elements of a group is compatible with the group law on if and only if it is equivalent to a relation of the form , for some normal subgroup of .
Proof. One direction of the theorem follows from our definition, so we prove the other, namely, that any relation compatible with the group law on is of the form , for a normal subgroup .
To this end, let be the set of elements equivalent to the identity, , under . Evidently, if , then , so ; the converse holds as well, so is equivalent to the statement "". Also, for any , so . Thus is closed under the group law on , so is a subgroup of . Then by definition, is a normal subgroup of .
Theorem 2. Let and be two groups; let be a group homomorphism from to , and let be the kernel of .
- If is a subgroup of , then the inverse image of under is a subgroup of ; if is normal in , then its inverse image is normal in . Consequently, is a normal subgroup of , and of this inverse image. If is surjective, then , and induces an isomorphism from to .
- If is a subgroup of , then is a subgroup of ; if is normal in , then is normal in . In particular, if is surjective, then is normal in . The inverse image of under is .
Proof. For the first part, suppose are elements of . Then , so is an element of . Hence is a subgroup of . If is a normal in , then for all in and all in , so thus is normal in . Applying this result to the trivial subgroup of , we prove that is normal in ; since the trivial subgroup of is also a subgroup of , is also a normal subgroup of . If is surjective, then by definition . Also, if and are elements of which are congruent mod , then , so . Thus induces an isomorphism from to which is evidently a homomorphism; hence, an isomorphism. This proves the first part of the theorem.
For the second part, suppose that are elements of . Then so is a subgroup of and of . Suppose is normal in . If is any element of , then so is normal in . If is surjective, then , so is normal in .
Finally, suppose that is an element of such that is an element of . Then for some , . Hence Then , for some . Then . This finishes the proof of the second part of the theorem.