1966 IMO Problems/Problem 6
Contents
Problem
In the interior of sides of triangle
, any points
, respectively, are selected. Prove that the area of at least one of the triangles
is less than or equal to one quarter of the area of triangle
.
Solution
Let the lengths of sides ,
, and
be
,
, and
, respectively. Let
,
, and
.
Now assume for the sake of contradiction that the areas of ,
, and
are all at greater than one fourth of that of
. Therefore
In other words, , or
. Similarly,
and
. Multiplying these three inequalities together yields
We also have that ,
, and
from the Arithmetic Mean-Geometric Mean Inequality. Multiplying these three inequalities together yields
This is a contradiction, which shows that our assumption must have been false in the first place. This proves the desired result.
Solution 2
Let . Then it is clear that the ratio of areas of
to that of
equals
, respectively. Suppose all three quantities exceed
. Then their product also exceeds
. However, it is clear by AM-GM that
, and so the product of all three quantities cannot exceed
(by the associative property of multiplication), a contradiction. Hence, at least one area is less than or equal to
.
Remarks (added by pf02, September 2024)
Solution 2 is written in a very sloppy way. However, an interested reader can make sense of it. More importantly, the two solutions are identical. If it wasn't for the sloppy writing, Solution 2 could be obtained from the first Solution after applying a word by word translation which replaces line segments by ratios.
Below I will give another solution. It is formally different from the previous solutions, even if not at a deep level.
Solution 3
Let and
be as in the problem.
Denote
as in Solution 2. Note that
because
are in the interior of the respective sides.
Using the fact that the
area of a triangle is half of the product of two sides and of
the angle between them (like in the first Solution), we have that
.
Now the problem has nothing to do with geometry anymore: we just have
to show that given three numbers , at least one
of
is
.
If , we are done. Otherwise, we have
. It follows that
(recall that
). In particular, it follows that
, which implies
.
If , we are done. Otherwise, we have
. Using the inequality on
from the
previous paragraph, we have
, or after
a few computations,
. Using the
observation about
from the preceding paragraph, we get
.
Now consider . Using the inequality on
from the previous
paragraph, we have that
. To finish the
solution to the problem, it is enough to show that
.
After some easy computations (and using again that ), this
becomes
, which is obvious.
(Solution by pf02, September 2024)
See Also
1966 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 5 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Last Problem |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |