Difference between revisions of "Minimal polynomial"
(definition and existance/uniqueness) |
m (→Proof of existence/uniqueness) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Proof of existence/uniqueness == | == Proof of existence/uniqueness == | ||
− | First note that as <math>\alpha</math> is algebraic over <math>F</math>, there do exist polynomials <math>f(x)\in F[x | + | First note that as <math>\alpha</math> is algebraic over <math>F</math>, there do exist polynomials <math>f(x)\in F[x]</math> with <math>f(\alpha)=0</math>, and hence there must exist at least one such polynomial, say <math>g(x)</math>, of minimum degree. Now multiplying a polynomial by a scalar does not change it's roots, so we can find some nonzero <math>a\in F</math> such that <math>m(x) = ag(x)</math> is monic. Now by definition it follows that <math>m(x)</math> is ''a'' minimal polynomial for <math>\alpha</math> over <math>F</math>. We now show that is is the only one. |
Assume that there is some other monic polynomial <math>m'(x)\in F[x]</math> such that <math>m'(\alpha)=0</math> and <math>\deg m' = \deg m</math>. By the division algorithm there must exist polynomials <math>q(x),r(x)\in F[x]</math> with <math>\deg r<\deg m</math> such that <math>m(x) = m'(x)q(x)+r(x)</math>. But now we have <math>r(\alpha) = m(\alpha)-m'(\alpha)q(\alpha) = 0</math>, which contradicts the minimality of <math>m(x)</math> unless <math>r(x) = 0</math>. It now follows that <math>m(x) = q(x)m'(x)</math>. And now, as <math>m(x)</math> and <math>m'(x)</math> are both monic polynomials of the same degree, it is easy to verify that <math>q(x)=1</math>, and hence <math>m(x) = m'(x)</math>. So indeed, <math>m(x)</math> is the ''only'' minimal polynomial for <math>\alpha</math> over <math>F</math>. | Assume that there is some other monic polynomial <math>m'(x)\in F[x]</math> such that <math>m'(\alpha)=0</math> and <math>\deg m' = \deg m</math>. By the division algorithm there must exist polynomials <math>q(x),r(x)\in F[x]</math> with <math>\deg r<\deg m</math> such that <math>m(x) = m'(x)q(x)+r(x)</math>. But now we have <math>r(\alpha) = m(\alpha)-m'(\alpha)q(\alpha) = 0</math>, which contradicts the minimality of <math>m(x)</math> unless <math>r(x) = 0</math>. It now follows that <math>m(x) = q(x)m'(x)</math>. And now, as <math>m(x)</math> and <math>m'(x)</math> are both monic polynomials of the same degree, it is easy to verify that <math>q(x)=1</math>, and hence <math>m(x) = m'(x)</math>. So indeed, <math>m(x)</math> is the ''only'' minimal polynomial for <math>\alpha</math> over <math>F</math>. | ||
[[Category:Field theory]] | [[Category:Field theory]] |
Latest revision as of 22:02, 1 March 2018
Given a field extension , if is algebraic over then the minimal polynomial of over is defined the monic polynomial of smallest degree such that . This polynomial is often denoted by , or simply by if is clear from context.
Proof of existence/uniqueness
First note that as is algebraic over , there do exist polynomials with , and hence there must exist at least one such polynomial, say , of minimum degree. Now multiplying a polynomial by a scalar does not change it's roots, so we can find some nonzero such that is monic. Now by definition it follows that is a minimal polynomial for over . We now show that is is the only one.
Assume that there is some other monic polynomial such that and . By the division algorithm there must exist polynomials with such that . But now we have , which contradicts the minimality of unless . It now follows that . And now, as and are both monic polynomials of the same degree, it is easy to verify that , and hence . So indeed, is the only minimal polynomial for over .