Difference between revisions of "2001 USAMO Problems/Problem 4"
(→Solution 1) |
Wwwrqnojcm (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 1) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Then, we wish to show | Then, we wish to show | ||
− | <cmath>(p-1)^2 + q^2 + (p-x)^2 + (q-y)^2 + 1 + x^2 + y^2 | + | <cmath>(p-1)^2 + q^2 + (p-x)^2 + (q-y)^2 + 1 + x^2 + y^2 \geq p^2 + q^2 + (x-1)^2 + y^2 </cmath> |
− | 2p^2 + 2q^2 + 2x^2 + 2y^2 - 2p - 2px - 2qy + 2 | + | <cmath>2p^2 + 2q^2 + 2x^2 + 2y^2 - 2p - 2px - 2qy + 2 \geq p^2 + q^2 + x^2 + y^2 - 2x + 1 </cmath> |
− | p^2 + q^2 + x^2 + y^2 + 2x - 2p - 2px - 2qy + 1 | + | <cmath>p^2 + q^2 + x^2 + y^2 + 2x - 2p - 2px - 2qy + 1 \geq 0 </cmath> |
− | (x-p)^2 + (q-y)^2 + 2(x-p) + 1 | + | <cmath>(x-p)^2 + (q-y)^2 + 2(x-p) + 1 \geq 0 </cmath> |
− | (x-p+1)^2 + (q-y)^2 | + | <cmath>(x-p+1)^2 + (q-y)^2 \geq 0,</cmath> |
which is true by the trivial inequality. | which is true by the trivial inequality. |
Revision as of 12:08, 10 March 2016
Problem
Let be a point in the plane of triangle such that the segments , , and are the sides of an obtuse triangle. Assume that in this triangle the obtuse angle opposes the side congruent to . Prove that is acute.
Solution
Solution 1
We know that and we wish to prove that . It would be sufficient to prove that Set , , , . Then, we wish to show
which is true by the trivial inequality.
Solution 2
Let be the origin. For a point , denote by the vector , and denote by the length of . The given conditions may be written as or Adding on both sides of the last inequality gives Since the left-hand side of the last inequality is nonnegative, the right-hand side is positive. Hence that is, is acute.
Solution 3
For the sake of contradiction, let's assume to the contrary that . Let , , and . Then . We claim that the quadrilateral is convex. Now applying the generalized Ptolemy's Theorem to the convex quadrilateral yields where the second inequality is by Cauchy-Schwarz. This implies , in contradiction with the facts that , , and are the sides of an obtuse triangle and .
We present two arguments to prove our claim.
First argument: Without loss of generality, we may assume that , , and are in counterclockwise order. Let lines and be the perpendicular bisectors of segments and , respectively. Then and meet at , the circumcenter of triangle . Lines and cut the plane into four regions and is in the interior of one of these regions. Since and , must be in the interior of the region that opposes . Since is not acute, ray does not meet and ray does not meet . Hence and must lie in the interiors of the regions adjacent to . Let denote the region containing . Then , , , and are the four regions in counterclockwise order. Since , either is on side or and are on opposite sides of line . In either case and are on opposite sides of line . Also, since ray does not meet and ray does not meet , it follows that is entirely in the interior of . Hence and are on opposite sides of . Therefore is convex.
Second argument: Since and , cannot be inside or on the sides of triangle . Since , we have and hence . Hence cannot be inside or on the sides of triangle . Symmetrically, cannot be inside or on the sides of triangle . Finally, since and , we have Therefore cannot be inside or on the sides of triangle . Since this covers all four cases, is convex.
Solution 4
Let be the origin in vector space, and let denote the position vectors of respectively. Then the obtuse triangle condition, , becomes using the fact that the square of a vector (the dot product of itself and itself) is the square of its magnitude. Now, notice that to prove is acute, it suffices to show that , or . But this follows from the observation that which leads to and therefore our desired conclusion.
See also
2001 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
Followed by Problem 5 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.