Difference between revisions of "2015 USAMO Problems/Problem 5"
(→Solution) |
Morgandaciuk (talk | contribs) m (→Solution) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Let <math>a, b, c, d, e</math> be distinct positive integers such that <math>a^4 + b^4 = c^4 + d^4 = e^5</math>. Show that <math>ac + bd</math> is a composite number. | Let <math>a, b, c, d, e</math> be distinct positive integers such that <math>a^4 + b^4 = c^4 + d^4 = e^5</math>. Show that <math>ac + bd</math> is a composite number. | ||
− | ===Solution=== | + | ===Solution 1=== |
Note: This solution is definitely not what the folks at MAA intended, but it works! | Note: This solution is definitely not what the folks at MAA intended, but it works! |
Revision as of 13:55, 4 January 2016
Problem
Let be distinct positive integers such that . Show that is a composite number.
Solution 1
Note: This solution is definitely not what the folks at MAA intended, but it works!
Look at the statement . This can be viewed as a special case of Beal's Conjecture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beal%27s_conjecture), stating that the equation has no solutions over positive integers for and . This special case was proven in 2009 by Michael Bennet, Jordan Ellenberg, and Nathan Ng, as . This case is obviously contained under that special case, so and must have a common factor greater than .
Call the greatest common factor of and . Then for some and likewise for some . Then consider the quantity .
.
Because and are both positive, , and by definition , so is composite.
~BealsConjecture
Another Solution
A more conventional approach, using proof by contradiction:
Without loss of generality, assume
Since , It is obvious that
We construct the equation (the right side is the factorization of the left) Which factors into: (by using and factoring)
If or equal zero, then equals or respectively, which is impossible because and because are distinct. Therefore the right side of the equation above is non-zero and the left side must be divisible by
If were prime,
We have
Which means that and neither nor can be multiples of meaning must be a multiple of and for some integer
But clearly this is impossible since .
Therefore, by contradiction, is composite.