Difference between revisions of "2015 USAMO Problems/Problem 5"
(Added page and kludgy solution) |
(→Solution) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Note: This solution is definitely not what the folks at MAA intended, but it works! | Note: This solution is definitely not what the folks at MAA intended, but it works! | ||
− | Look at the statement <math>a^4+b^4=e^5</math>. This can be viewed as a special case of | + | Look at the statement <math>a^4+b^4=e^5</math>. This can be viewed as a special case of Beal's Conjecture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beal%27s_conjecture), stating that the equation <math>A^x+B^y=C^z</math> has no solutions over positive integers for <math>gcd(a, b, c) = 1</math> and <math>x, y, z > 2</math>. This special case was proven in 2009 by Michael Bennet, Jordan Ellenberg, and Nathan Ng, as <math>(x, y, z) = (2, 4, n)</math>. This case <math>a^4+b^4=e^5</math> is obviously contained under that special case, so <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> must have a common factor greater than <math>1</math>. |
Call the greatest common factor of <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> <math>f</math>. Then <math>a = f \cdot a_1</math> for some <math>a_1</math> and likewise <math>b = f \cdot b_1</math> for some <math>b_1</math>. Then consider the quantity <math>ac+bd</math>. | Call the greatest common factor of <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> <math>f</math>. Then <math>a = f \cdot a_1</math> for some <math>a_1</math> and likewise <math>b = f \cdot b_1</math> for some <math>b_1</math>. Then consider the quantity <math>ac+bd</math>. |
Revision as of 13:56, 13 May 2015
Problem
Let be distinct positive integers such that . Show that is a composite number.
Solution
Note: This solution is definitely not what the folks at MAA intended, but it works!
Look at the statement . This can be viewed as a special case of Beal's Conjecture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beal%27s_conjecture), stating that the equation has no solutions over positive integers for and . This special case was proven in 2009 by Michael Bennet, Jordan Ellenberg, and Nathan Ng, as . This case is obviously contained under that special case, so and must have a common factor greater than .
Call the greatest common factor of and . Then for some and likewise for some . Then consider the quantity .
.
Because and are both positive, , and by definition , so is composite.
~BealsConjecture