Difference between revisions of "2000 AMC 10 Problems/Problem 21"
(→Solution) |
(→Problem) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
If all alligators are ferocious creatures and some creepy crawlers are alligators, which statement(s) must be true? | If all alligators are ferocious creatures and some creepy crawlers are alligators, which statement(s) must be true? | ||
− | + | <cmath>\textrm{I. All alligators are creepy crawlers.}</cmath> | |
− | + | <cmath>\textrm{II. Some ferocious creatures are creepy crawlers.}</cmath> | |
− | + | <cmath>\textrm{III. Some alligators are not creepy crawlers.}</cmath> | |
<math>\mathrm{(A)}\ \text{I only} \qquad\mathrm{(B)}\ \text{II only} \qquad\mathrm{(C)}\ \text{III only} \qquad\mathrm{(D)}\ \text{II and III only} \qquad\mathrm{(E)}\ \text{None must be true}</math> | <math>\mathrm{(A)}\ \text{I only} \qquad\mathrm{(B)}\ \text{II only} \qquad\mathrm{(C)}\ \text{III only} \qquad\mathrm{(D)}\ \text{II and III only} \qquad\mathrm{(E)}\ \text{None must be true}</math> |
Revision as of 15:11, 21 June 2014
Problem
If all alligators are ferocious creatures and some creepy crawlers are alligators, which statement(s) must be true?
Solution
We interpret the problem statement as a query about three abstract concepts denoted as "alligators", "creepy crawlers" and "ferocious creatures". In answering the question, we may NOT refer to reality -- for example to the fact that alligators do exist.
To make more clear that we are not using anything outside the problem statement, let's rename the three concepts as , , and .
We got the following information:
- If is an , then is an .
- There is some that is a and at the same time an .
We CAN NOT conclude that the first statement is true. For example, the situation "Johnny and Freddy are s, but only Johnny is a " meets both conditions, but the first statement is false.
We CAN conclude that the second statement is true. We know that there is some that is a and at the same time an . Pick one such and call it Bobby. Additionally, we know that if is an , then is an . Bobby is an , therefore Bobby is an . And this is enough to prove the second statement -- Bobby is an that is also a .
We CAN NOT conclude that the third statement is true. For example, consider the situation when , and are equivalent (represent the same set of objects). In such case both conditions are satisfied, but the third statement is false.
Therefore the answer is .
See Also
2000 AMC 10 (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 20 |
Followed by Problem 22 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | ||
All AMC 10 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.