Difference between revisions of "2001 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
m (→See also) |
(→Alternate Solution using Isolated Fudging) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Similarly <math>\frac{b}{\sqrt{b^2+8ca}} \geq \frac{b^{\frac{4}{3}}}{a^{\frac{4}{3}}+b^{\frac{4}{3}}+c^{\frac{4}{3}}}</math> and <math>\frac{c}{\sqrt{c^2+8ab}} \geq \frac{c^{\frac{4}{3}}}{a^{\frac{4}{3}}+b^{\frac{4}{3}}+c^{\frac{4}{3}}}</math>. | Similarly <math>\frac{b}{\sqrt{b^2+8ca}} \geq \frac{b^{\frac{4}{3}}}{a^{\frac{4}{3}}+b^{\frac{4}{3}}+c^{\frac{4}{3}}}</math> and <math>\frac{c}{\sqrt{c^2+8ab}} \geq \frac{c^{\frac{4}{3}}}{a^{\frac{4}{3}}+b^{\frac{4}{3}}+c^{\frac{4}{3}}}</math>. | ||
Summing the three inequalities, we obtain the original inequality. | Summing the three inequalities, we obtain the original inequality. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Alternate Solution using Cauchy === | ||
+ | |||
+ | We want to prove <cmath>\sum_{cyc}\dfrac{a}{\sqrt{a^2+8bc}}\ge 1</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that since this inequality is homogenous, assume <math>a+b+c=3</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | By Cauchy, <math>\left(\sum_{cyc}\dfrac{a}{\sqrt{a^2+8bc}}\right)\left(\sum_{cyc}a\sqrt{a^2+8bc}\right)\ge (a+b+c)^2=9</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dividing both sides by <math>\sum_{cyc}a\sqrt{a^2+8bc}</math>, we see that we want to prove <cmath>\dfrac{9}{\sum\limits_{cyc}a\sqrt{a^2+8bc}}\ge 1</cmath> or equivalently <cmath>\sum\limits_{cyc}a\sqrt{a^2+8bc}\le 9</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Squaring both sides, we have <cmath>\left(\sum_{cyc}a\sqrt{a^2+8bc}\right)^2\le 81</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now use Cauchy again to obtain <cmath>\left(\sum_{cyc}a\sqrt{a^2+8bc}\right)^2\le (a+b+c)\left(\sum_{cyc}a(a^2+8bc)\right)\le 81</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Since <math>a+b+c=3</math>, the inequality becomes <cmath>\sum_{cyc}a^3+8abc\le 27</cmath> after some simplifying. | ||
+ | |||
+ | But this equals <cmath>(a+b+c)^3-3\left(\sum_{sym}a^2b\right)+18abc\le 27</cmath> and since <math>a+b+c=3</math> we just want to prove <cmath>\left(\sum_{sym}a^2b\right)\ge 6abc</cmath> after some simplifying. | ||
+ | |||
+ | But that is true by AM-GM. Thus, proved. \(\Box\) | ||
== See also == | == See also == |
Revision as of 00:33, 21 May 2014
Problem
Let be positive real numbers. Prove that .
Contents
Solution
Solution using Holder's
By Holder's inequality, Thus we need only show that Which is obviously true since .
Alternate Solution using Jensen's
This inequality is homogeneous so we can assume without loss of generality and apply Jensen's inequality for , so we get: but by AMGM, and thus the inequality is proven.
Alternate Solution using Isolated Fudging
We claim that Cross-multiplying, squaring both sides and expanding, we have After cancelling the term, we apply AM-GM to RHS and obtain as desired, completing the proof of the claim.
Similarly and . Summing the three inequalities, we obtain the original inequality.
Alternate Solution using Cauchy
We want to prove
Note that since this inequality is homogenous, assume .
By Cauchy,
Dividing both sides by , we see that we want to prove or equivalently
Squaring both sides, we have
Now use Cauchy again to obtain
Since , the inequality becomes after some simplifying.
But this equals and since we just want to prove after some simplifying.
But that is true by AM-GM. Thus, proved. \(\Box\)
See also
2001 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 3 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |