Difference between revisions of "2013 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
Skywalker94 (talk | contribs) (Added solution.) |
Skywalker94 (talk | contribs) m (→Solution: Fixed inconsistent formatting.) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
'''Inductive step:''' Let <math>n</math> be arbitrary and fixed. Case on the parity of <math>n</math>: | '''Inductive step:''' Let <math>n</math> be arbitrary and fixed. Case on the parity of <math>n</math>: | ||
− | [Case 1: <math>n</math> is even] <math>1 + \frac{2^{m+1} - 1}{n} = \ | + | [Case 1: <math>n</math> is even] <math>1 + \frac{2^{m+1} - 1}{n} = \left( 1 + \frac{2^{m} - 1}{\frac{n}{2}} \right) \cdot \left( 1 + \frac{1}{n + 2^{m+1} - 2} \right)</math> |
− | [Case 2: <math>n</math> is odd] <math>1 + \frac{2^{m+1} - 1}{n} = \ | + | [Case 2: <math>n</math> is odd] <math>1 + \frac{2^{m+1} - 1}{n} = \left( 1 + \frac{2^{m}-1}{\frac{n+1}{2}} \right) \cdot \left( 1 + \frac{1}{n} \right)</math> |
− | In either case, <math>1 + \frac{2^{m+1} - 1}{n} = \frac{ | + | In either case, <math>1 + \frac{2^{m+1} - 1}{n} = \left( 1 + \frac{2^m - 1}{c} \right) \cdot \left( 1 + \frac{1}{a_{m+1}} \right)</math> for some <math>c, a_{m+1} \in \mathbb{Z}^+</math>. |
− | By the induction hypothesis we can choose <math>a_1, ..., a_m</math> such that <math>\frac{ | + | By the induction hypothesis we can choose <math>a_1, ..., a_m</math> such that <math>\left( 1 + \frac{2^m - 1}{c} \right) = \prod_{i=1}^{m} (1 + \frac{1}{a_i})</math>. |
Therefore, since <math>n</math> was arbitrary, the claim is true for <math>k = m+1</math>, for all <math>n</math>. Our induction is complete and the claim is true for all positive integers <math>n</math>, <math>k</math>. | Therefore, since <math>n</math> was arbitrary, the claim is true for <math>k = m+1</math>, for all <math>n</math>. Our induction is complete and the claim is true for all positive integers <math>n</math>, <math>k</math>. |
Revision as of 20:19, 6 January 2014
Problem
Prove that for any pair of positive integers and , there exist positive integers (not necessarily different) such that
.
Solution
We prove the claim by induction on .
Base case: If then , so the claim is true for all positive integers .
Inductive hypothesis: Suppose that for some the claim is true for , for all .
Inductive step: Let be arbitrary and fixed. Case on the parity of :
[Case 1: is even]
[Case 2: is odd]
In either case, for some .
By the induction hypothesis we can choose such that .
Therefore, since was arbitrary, the claim is true for , for all . Our induction is complete and the claim is true for all positive integers , .