Difference between revisions of "User talk:MCrawford"
Mysmartmouth (talk | contribs) |
(Using the "+" button) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
EDIT: I was trying to create a template, and had a question, but I figured it out. Sorry! --[[User:Mysmartmouth|Sean]] 23:19, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | EDIT: I was trying to create a template, and had a question, but I figured it out. Sorry! --[[User:Mysmartmouth|Sean]] 23:19, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Using the "+" button == | ||
+ | |||
+ | When leaving messages on other people's user talk pages, it is generally advised to use the "+" button unless you're replying on the same topic. This creates a nice table of contents, and makes everything nice and neat, and you can see the different conversations rather than it all be jumbled together ;) [[User:Ignite168|Ignite168]] 23:45, 30 June 2006 (EDT) |
Revision as of 22:45, 30 June 2006
When you say that a book is Douglas Adam's only non-fiction work, you need to check around. I think you miss the salmon of doubt. --PenguinIntegral 21:33, 21 June 2006 (EDT)
I agree that the titles in my small "rational approximation" series are far from perfection, so feel free to change them. On the other hand, the proof of the non-Liouvillian charachter of , say, is sufficiently long and complicated to deserve its own article. My plan was to give the proofs for , and . To combine them all in one article would be a disaster: it'll be just too long to be readable. Anyway, if you can come up with a better structure and article titles for this small series, I'll be only happy. By the way, should I post my replies here or in my own User Talk section? This time I did both.--Fedja 13:00, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
EDIT: I was trying to create a template, and had a question, but I figured it out. Sorry! --Sean 23:19, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
Using the "+" button
When leaving messages on other people's user talk pages, it is generally advised to use the "+" button unless you're replying on the same topic. This creates a nice table of contents, and makes everything nice and neat, and you can see the different conversations rather than it all be jumbled together ;) Ignite168 23:45, 30 June 2006 (EDT)