Difference between revisions of "Steiner's Theorem"
m (LaTeX errors FTL) |
(→Proof) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Now consider triangles <math>HBA</math> and <math>HDC</math>. Segments <math>AC</math> and <math>BD</math> are transversal lines, so it's not hard to see that <math>\triangle HAB \sim \triangle HCD</math>. It's also not hard to show that <math>\triangle HBE \sim \triangle HDF</math> by SAS similarity. Therefore <math>\angle BHE=\angle DHF</math>, which implies that <math>F</math>, <math>G</math>, and <math>H</math> are collinear. This completes the proof. | Now consider triangles <math>HBA</math> and <math>HDC</math>. Segments <math>AC</math> and <math>BD</math> are transversal lines, so it's not hard to see that <math>\triangle HAB \sim \triangle HCD</math>. It's also not hard to show that <math>\triangle HBE \sim \triangle HDF</math> by SAS similarity. Therefore <math>\angle BHE=\angle DHF</math>, which implies that <math>F</math>, <math>G</math>, and <math>H</math> are collinear. This completes the proof. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Alternative Proof''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Define <math>E, F, G, H</math> the same as above. Then there exists a positive homothety about <math>E</math> mapping <math>\triangle EAB \to \triangle ECD \implies</math> the homothety takes <math>F \to G \implies E, F, G</math> are collinear. Similarly, there is a negative homothety taking <math>\triangle HAB \to \triangle HCD \implies HFG</math> are collinear. So, <math>E, F, G, H</math> are collinear, as desired <math>\blacksquare</math>. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== |
Revision as of 02:01, 23 March 2013
Steiner's Theorem states that in a trapezoid with and , we have that the midpoint of and , the intersection of diagonals and , and the intersection of the sides and are collinear.
Proof
Let be the intersection of and , be the midpiont of , be the midpoint of , and be the intersection of and . We now claim that . First note that, since and [this is because ], we have that . Then , and , so . We earlier stated that , so we have that from SAS similarity. We have that , , and are collinear, and since and are on the same side of line , we can see that from SAS. Therefore , so , , and are collinear.
Now consider triangles and . Segments and are transversal lines, so it's not hard to see that . It's also not hard to show that by SAS similarity. Therefore , which implies that , , and are collinear. This completes the proof.
Alternative Proof
Define the same as above. Then there exists a positive homothety about mapping the homothety takes are collinear. Similarly, there is a negative homothety taking are collinear. So, are collinear, as desired .