Difference between revisions of "Equivalence relation"

 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
1. For every element <math>x \in S</math>, <math>x \sim x</math>.  (Reflexive property)
 
1. For every element <math>x \in S</math>, <math>x \sim x</math>.  (Reflexive property)
 +
 
2. If <math>x, y \in S</math> such that <math>x \sim y</math>, then we also have <math>y \sim x</math>.  (Symmetric property)
 
2. If <math>x, y \in S</math> such that <math>x \sim y</math>, then we also have <math>y \sim x</math>.  (Symmetric property)
 +
 
3. If <math>x, y, z \in S</math> such that <math>x \sim y</math> and <math>y \sim z</math>, then we also have <math>x \sim z</math>.  (Transitive property)
 
3. If <math>x, y, z \in S</math> such that <math>x \sim y</math> and <math>y \sim z</math>, then we also have <math>x \sim z</math>.  (Transitive property)
  

Revision as of 21:18, 23 June 2006

Let $S$ be a set. A relation $\sim$ on $S$ is said to be an equivalence relation if $\sim$ satisfies the following three properties:

1. For every element $x \in S$, $x \sim x$. (Reflexive property)

2. If $x, y \in S$ such that $x \sim y$, then we also have $y \sim x$. (Symmetric property)

3. If $x, y, z \in S$ such that $x \sim y$ and $y \sim z$, then we also have $x \sim z$. (Transitive property)

Some common examples of equivalence relations:

  • The relation $=$ (equality), on the set of real numbers.
  • The relation $\cong$ (congruence), on the set of geometric figures in the plane.
  • The relation $\sim$ (similarity), on the set of geometric figures in the plane.
  • For a given positive integer $n$, the relation $\equiv$ (mod $n$), on the set of integers.