Difference between revisions of "User talk:Azjps"
m (clearup) |
(→Cone: new section) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Note == | == Note == | ||
I am testing a short greasemonkey script to (semi-)automatically format contest articles, under the hope that this can make the articles here consistent and easily accessible. Apologies for the flood of edits; comments and suggestions are greatly welcomed. <font style="font-family:Georgia,sans-serif">[[User:Azjps|azjps]] ([[User talk:Azjps|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</font> 05:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | I am testing a short greasemonkey script to (semi-)automatically format contest articles, under the hope that this can make the articles here consistent and easily accessible. Apologies for the flood of edits; comments and suggestions are greatly welcomed. <font style="font-family:Georgia,sans-serif">[[User:Azjps|azjps]] ([[User talk:Azjps|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</font> 05:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Cone == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hi Azjps, thanks for the cones! Two (hopefully minor) requests: right now, both cones seem really large. It is possible to make them smaller or put them in a box to the side or something? Also, in the oblique cone, the segment labeled <math>r</math> shouldn't be, but it might be nice to include an actual radius of the circle in the picture, too. | ||
| + | Thanks! --[[User:JBL|JBL]] 23:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:21, 2 March 2010
Discussion
Note
I am testing a short greasemonkey script to (semi-)automatically format contest articles, under the hope that this can make the articles here consistent and easily accessible. Apologies for the flood of edits; comments and suggestions are greatly welcomed. azjps (talk) 05:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Cone
Hi Azjps, thanks for the cones! Two (hopefully minor) requests: right now, both cones seem really large. It is possible to make them smaller or put them in a box to the side or something? Also, in the oblique cone, the segment labeled 
shouldn't be, but it might be nice to include an actual radius of the circle in the picture, too.
Thanks! --JBL 23:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
