Difference between revisions of "Wilson's Theorem"
m (→Proof) |
m (organization) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Example== | ==Example== | ||
− | |||
− | < | + | * Let <math>{p}</math> be a prime number such that dividing <math>{p}</math> by 4 leaves the remainder 1. Show that there is an integer <math>{n}</math> such that <math>n^2 + 1</math> is divisible by <math>{p}</math>. |
− | + | * If <math>\displaystyle{p}</math> is a prime greater than 2, define <math>p=2q+1</math>. Prove that <math>(q!)^2 + (-1)^q</math> is divisible by <math>\displaystyle{p}</math>. | |
− | If | + | |
− | Prove that <math>(q!)^2 + (-1)^q</math> is divisible by | + | [http://www.mathlinks.ro/Forum/viewtopic.php?&t=21733 Solution] |
− | <math> | ||
== See also == | == See also == |
Revision as of 16:57, 19 June 2006
Contents
Statement
If and only if is a prime, then is a multiple of . In other words .
Proof
Wilson's theorem is easily verifiable for 2 and 3, so let's consider . If is composite, then its positive factors are among
Hence, , so .
However, if is prime, then each of the above integers are relatively prime to . So, for each of these integers a, there is another such that . It is important to note that this is unique modulo , and that since is prime, if and only if is or . Now, if we omit 1 and , then the others can be grouped into pairs whose product is congruent to one,
Finally, multiply this equality by to complete the proof.
Example
- Let be a prime number such that dividing by 4 leaves the remainder 1. Show that there is an integer such that is divisible by .
- If is a prime greater than 2, define . Prove that is divisible by .