Difference between revisions of "User talk:Me@home"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
When creating a new article to direct users to an existing article, there is a redirect function that does this automatically. Read [http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=97479 this post] for an explanation on how to redirect users. Thanks.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 15:36, 19 June 2006 (EDT) | When creating a new article to direct users to an existing article, there is a redirect function that does this automatically. Read [http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=97479 this post] for an explanation on how to redirect users. Thanks.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 15:36, 19 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
+ | ----- | ||
+ | |||
+ | I noticed you're working on two prime factorization articles. Since prime factorization is not a proper noun, the article should be "Prime factorization" instead of "Prime Factorization". Also, there is really no need to create a redirect for each possible capitalization. The wiki software automatically adjusts capitalization for the first letter for obvious reasons, but is case sensitive otherwise. Nobody else should be using prime factorization as a common noun (or else their link should be changed). Thanks.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 15:52, 19 June 2006 (EDT) |
Revision as of 14:52, 19 June 2006
When creating a new article to direct users to an existing article, there is a redirect function that does this automatically. Read this post for an explanation on how to redirect users. Thanks.--MCrawford 15:36, 19 June 2006 (EDT)
I noticed you're working on two prime factorization articles. Since prime factorization is not a proper noun, the article should be "Prime factorization" instead of "Prime Factorization". Also, there is really no need to create a redirect for each possible capitalization. The wiki software automatically adjusts capitalization for the first letter for obvious reasons, but is case sensitive otherwise. Nobody else should be using prime factorization as a common noun (or else their link should be changed). Thanks.--MCrawford 15:52, 19 June 2006 (EDT)