Difference between revisions of "Talk:Harmonic mean"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I just corrected the inequality (HM is the least one of the three, not the middle one!) and added the positivity assumption. --[[User:fedja|fedja]] | I just corrected the inequality (HM is the least one of the three, not the middle one!) and added the positivity assumption. --[[User:fedja|fedja]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why not just make an article called RMS-AM-GM-HM? --[[User:Chess64|Chess64]] 18:22, 18 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:22, 18 June 2006
I'm not sure I like the chosen name or statement of the inequality chain. Any thoughts on this? --MCrawford 17:45, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
I slightly changed the statement. It is now more explictly labeled. I have never seen this expressed other than AM-HM-GM, so I can't really change that...--IntrepidMath 17:54, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
I just corrected the inequality (HM is the least one of the three, not the middle one!) and added the positivity assumption. --fedja
Why not just make an article called RMS-AM-GM-HM? --Chess64 18:22, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
