Difference between revisions of "Wilson's Theorem"
m |
(→Example Problem utilizing Wilson's) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Finally, multiply this equality by <math>p-1</math> to complete the proof. | Finally, multiply this equality by <math>p-1</math> to complete the proof. | ||
− | ==Example | + | ==Example== |
− | < | + | Let <math>{p}</math> be a prime number such that dividing <math>{p}<math> by 4 leaves the remainder 1. Show that there is an integer <math>{n}</math> such that <math>n^2+1</math> is divisible by <math>{p}</math>. |
+ | <Solutions?> | ||
== See also == | == See also == |
Revision as of 23:40, 17 June 2006
Contents
Statement
If and only if is a prime, then is a multiple of . In other words .
Proof
Wilson's theorem is easily verifiable for 2 and 3, so let's consider . If is composite, then its positive factors are among . Hence, , so .
However if is prime, then each of the above integers are relatively prime to . So for each of these integers a there is another such that . It is important to note that this is unique modulo , and that since is prime, if and only if is or . Now if we omit 1 and , then the others can be grouped into pairs whose product is congruent to one,
Finally, multiply this equality by to complete the proof.
Example
Let be a prime number such that dividing such that is divisible by .
<Solutions?>