Difference between revisions of "Mass points"
Horseneck3 (talk | contribs) m (→Examples:) |
(Formatting) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Mass points''' is a technique in [[Euclidean geometry]] that can greatly simplify the proofs of many theorems concerning [[polygon]]s, and is helpful in solving complex geometry problems involving lengths. In essence, it involves using a local [[coordinate system]] to identify [[point]]s by the [[ratio]]s into which they divide [[line segment]]s. Mass points are generalized by [[barycentric coordinates]]. | '''Mass points''' is a technique in [[Euclidean geometry]] that can greatly simplify the proofs of many theorems concerning [[polygon]]s, and is helpful in solving complex geometry problems involving lengths. In essence, it involves using a local [[coordinate system]] to identify [[point]]s by the [[ratio]]s into which they divide [[line segment]]s. Mass points are generalized by [[barycentric coordinates]]. | ||
− | Mass point geometry was invented by Franz Mobius in 1827 along with his theory of homogeneous coordinates. The technique did not catch on until the 1960s when New York high school students made it popular. The technique greatly simplifies certain problems. | + | Mass point geometry was invented by [[Franz Mobius]] in 1827 along with his theory of [[homogeneous coordinates]]. The technique did not catch on until the 1960s when New York high school students made it popular. The technique greatly simplifies certain problems. |
− | == | + | == Uses == |
Mass point geometry involves systematically assigning 'weights' to points using ratios of lengths relating vertices, which can then be used to deduce other lengths, using the fact that the lengths must be inversely proportional to their weight (just like a balanced lever). Additionally, the point dividing the line has a mass equal to the sum of the weights on either end of the line (like the fulcrum of a lever). | Mass point geometry involves systematically assigning 'weights' to points using ratios of lengths relating vertices, which can then be used to deduce other lengths, using the fact that the lengths must be inversely proportional to their weight (just like a balanced lever). Additionally, the point dividing the line has a mass equal to the sum of the weights on either end of the line (like the fulcrum of a lever). | ||
The way to systematically assign weights to the points involves first choosing a point for the entire figure to balance around. From there, WLOG a first weight can be assigned. From the first weight, others can be derived using a few simple rules. | The way to systematically assign weights to the points involves first choosing a point for the entire figure to balance around. From there, WLOG a first weight can be assigned. From the first weight, others can be derived using a few simple rules. | ||
Given a line <math>AB</math> with point <math>C</math> on it, and the mass put on a point P is denoted as <math>m_P</math>, | Given a line <math>AB</math> with point <math>C</math> on it, and the mass put on a point P is denoted as <math>m_P</math>, | ||
− | + | # If two points balance, the product of the mass and distance from a line of balance of one point will equal the product of the mass and distance from the same line of balance of the other point. In other words, <math>\frac{AC}{CB} = \frac{m_B}{m_A}</math>. | |
− | + | # If two points are balanced, the point on the balancing line used to balance them has a mass equal to the sum of the masses of the two points. That is, <math>m_C = m_A + m_B</math>. | |
− | == Examples | + | == Examples == |
− | |||
− | |||
== Example 1== | == Example 1== | ||
Consider a triangle <math>ABC</math> with its three [[Median_(geometry)|median]]s drawn, with the intersection points being <math>D, E, F,</math> corresponding to <math>AB, BC,</math> and <math>AC</math> respectively. Let the centroid of triangle <math>ABC</math> be <math>P</math>. Prove <math>DP:PC</math> is <math>1:2</math> and the corresponding identities for medians from <math>A</math> and <math>B</math>. | Consider a triangle <math>ABC</math> with its three [[Median_(geometry)|median]]s drawn, with the intersection points being <math>D, E, F,</math> corresponding to <math>AB, BC,</math> and <math>AC</math> respectively. Let the centroid of triangle <math>ABC</math> be <math>P</math>. Prove <math>DP:PC</math> is <math>1:2</math> and the corresponding identities for medians from <math>A</math> and <math>B</math>. | ||
− | == Solution | + | === Solution === |
Thus, if we label point <math>A</math> with a weight of <math>1</math>, <math>B</math> must also have a weight of <math>1</math> since <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are equidistant from <math>P</math>. By the same process, we find <math>C</math> must also have a weight of 1. Now, since <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> both have a weight of <math>1</math>, <math>D</math> must have a weight of <math>2</math> (as is true for <math>E</math> and <math>F</math>). Thus, if we label the centroid <math>P</math>, we can deduce that <math>DP:PC</math> is <math>1:2</math> - the inverse ratio of their weights. | Thus, if we label point <math>A</math> with a weight of <math>1</math>, <math>B</math> must also have a weight of <math>1</math> since <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are equidistant from <math>P</math>. By the same process, we find <math>C</math> must also have a weight of 1. Now, since <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> both have a weight of <math>1</math>, <math>D</math> must have a weight of <math>2</math> (as is true for <math>E</math> and <math>F</math>). Thus, if we label the centroid <math>P</math>, we can deduce that <math>DP:PC</math> is <math>1:2</math> - the inverse ratio of their weights. | ||
− | == Example 2== | + | == Example 2 == |
<math>\triangle ABC</math> has point <math>D</math> on <math>AB</math>, point <math>E</math> on <math>BC</math>, and point <math>F</math> on <math>AC</math>. <math>AE</math>, <math>CD</math>, and <math>BF</math> intersect at point <math>G</math>. The ratio <math>AD:DB</math> is <math>3:5</math> and the ratio <math>CE:EB</math> is <math>8:3</math>. Find the ratio of <math>FG:GB</math> | <math>\triangle ABC</math> has point <math>D</math> on <math>AB</math>, point <math>E</math> on <math>BC</math>, and point <math>F</math> on <math>AC</math>. <math>AE</math>, <math>CD</math>, and <math>BF</math> intersect at point <math>G</math>. The ratio <math>AD:DB</math> is <math>3:5</math> and the ratio <math>CE:EB</math> is <math>8:3</math>. Find the ratio of <math>FG:GB</math> | ||
− | == Solution | + | === Solution === |
Throughout this solution, let <math>W_{X}</math> denote the weight at point <math>X</math>. Since <math>\frac{CE}{EB} = \frac{8}{3}</math>, let <math>W_{B} = 8</math>, which makes <math>W_{C} = 3</math>. Now, look at <math>AB</math>. Since <math>W_{B} \cdot BD = W_{A} \cdot AD</math> (this is a general property commonly used in many mass points problems, in fact it is the same property we used above to determine <math>W_{B}</math>), we have <math>W_{A} = W_{B} \cdot \frac{BD}{AD} = 8 \cdot \frac{5}{3} = \frac{40}{3}</math>. Then, <math>W_{F} = W_{A} + W_{C} = \frac{40}{3} + 3 = \frac{49}{3}</math> (another property of mass points). Finally, we have <math>FG:GB = W_{B}:W_{F} = 8:\frac{49}{3} = \boxed{24:49}</math>. | Throughout this solution, let <math>W_{X}</math> denote the weight at point <math>X</math>. Since <math>\frac{CE}{EB} = \frac{8}{3}</math>, let <math>W_{B} = 8</math>, which makes <math>W_{C} = 3</math>. Now, look at <math>AB</math>. Since <math>W_{B} \cdot BD = W_{A} \cdot AD</math> (this is a general property commonly used in many mass points problems, in fact it is the same property we used above to determine <math>W_{B}</math>), we have <math>W_{A} = W_{B} \cdot \frac{BD}{AD} = 8 \cdot \frac{5}{3} = \frac{40}{3}</math>. Then, <math>W_{F} = W_{A} + W_{C} = \frac{40}{3} + 3 = \frac{49}{3}</math> (another property of mass points). Finally, we have <math>FG:GB = W_{B}:W_{F} = 8:\frac{49}{3} = \boxed{24:49}</math>. | ||
− | ==Problems== | + | == Problems == |
− | |||
− | [[2016 AMC 10A Problems/Problem 19]] | + | * [[2019 AMC 8 Problems/Problem 24]] |
− | + | * [[2016 AMC 10A Problems/Problem 19]] | |
− | [[2013 AMC 10B Problems/Problem 16]] | + | * [[2013 AMC 10B Problems/Problem 16]] |
− | + | * [[2004 AMC 10B Problems/Problem 20]] | |
− | [[2004 AMC 10B Problems/Problem 20]] | + | * [[2016 AMC 12A Problems/Problem 12]] |
− | + | * [[2009 AIME I Problems/Problem 5]] | |
− | [[2016 AMC 12A Problems/Problem 12]] | + | * [[2009 AIME I Problems/Problem 4]] |
− | + | * [[2003 AIME I Problems/Problem 15]] | |
− | [[2009 AIME I Problems/Problem 5]] | + | * [[2001 AIME I Problems/Problem 7 ]] |
− | + | * [[2011 AIME II Problems/Problem 4]] | |
− | [[2009 AIME I Problems/Problem 4]] | + | * [[1992 AIME Problems/Problem 14 ]] |
− | + | * [[1988 AIME Problems/Problem 12]] | |
− | [[2003 AIME I Problems/Problem 15]] | + | * [[1989 AIME Problems/Problem 15]] |
− | + | * [[1985 AIME Problems/Problem 6]] | |
− | [[2001 AIME I Problems/Problem 7 ]] | + | * [[1971 AHSME Problems/Problem 26]] |
− | |||
− | [[2011 AIME II Problems/Problem 4]] | ||
− | |||
− | [[ 1992 AIME Problems/Problem 14 ]] | ||
− | |||
− | [[ 1988 AIME Problems/Problem 12]] | ||
− | |||
− | [[1989 AIME Problems/Problem 15]] | ||
− | |||
− | [[1985 AIME Problems/Problem 6]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | [[1971 AHSME Problems/Problem 26]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | == Videos == | ||
+ | * [//www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQim7-wrwL0 The Central NC Math Group's lecture on Mass Points and Barycentric Coordinates] | ||
+ | * [//www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtBgp5WZni8 Video from Double Donut] | ||
[[Category:Definition]] | [[Category:Definition]] | ||
[[Category:Geometry]] | [[Category:Geometry]] | ||
+ | {{stub}} |
Latest revision as of 14:43, 1 March 2025
Mass points is a technique in Euclidean geometry that can greatly simplify the proofs of many theorems concerning polygons, and is helpful in solving complex geometry problems involving lengths. In essence, it involves using a local coordinate system to identify points by the ratios into which they divide line segments. Mass points are generalized by barycentric coordinates.
Mass point geometry was invented by Franz Mobius in 1827 along with his theory of homogeneous coordinates. The technique did not catch on until the 1960s when New York high school students made it popular. The technique greatly simplifies certain problems.
Uses
Mass point geometry involves systematically assigning 'weights' to points using ratios of lengths relating vertices, which can then be used to deduce other lengths, using the fact that the lengths must be inversely proportional to their weight (just like a balanced lever). Additionally, the point dividing the line has a mass equal to the sum of the weights on either end of the line (like the fulcrum of a lever).
The way to systematically assign weights to the points involves first choosing a point for the entire figure to balance around. From there, WLOG a first weight can be assigned. From the first weight, others can be derived using a few simple rules.
Given a line with point
on it, and the mass put on a point P is denoted as
,
- If two points balance, the product of the mass and distance from a line of balance of one point will equal the product of the mass and distance from the same line of balance of the other point. In other words,
.
- If two points are balanced, the point on the balancing line used to balance them has a mass equal to the sum of the masses of the two points. That is,
.
Examples
Example 1
Consider a triangle with its three medians drawn, with the intersection points being
corresponding to
and
respectively. Let the centroid of triangle
be
. Prove
is
and the corresponding identities for medians from
and
.
Solution
Thus, if we label point with a weight of
,
must also have a weight of
since
and
are equidistant from
. By the same process, we find
must also have a weight of 1. Now, since
and
both have a weight of
,
must have a weight of
(as is true for
and
). Thus, if we label the centroid
, we can deduce that
is
- the inverse ratio of their weights.
Example 2
has point
on
, point
on
, and point
on
.
,
, and
intersect at point
. The ratio
is
and the ratio
is
. Find the ratio of
Solution
Throughout this solution, let denote the weight at point
. Since
, let
, which makes
. Now, look at
. Since
(this is a general property commonly used in many mass points problems, in fact it is the same property we used above to determine
), we have
. Then,
(another property of mass points). Finally, we have
.
Problems
- 2019 AMC 8 Problems/Problem 24
- 2016 AMC 10A Problems/Problem 19
- 2013 AMC 10B Problems/Problem 16
- 2004 AMC 10B Problems/Problem 20
- 2016 AMC 12A Problems/Problem 12
- 2009 AIME I Problems/Problem 5
- 2009 AIME I Problems/Problem 4
- 2003 AIME I Problems/Problem 15
- 2001 AIME I Problems/Problem 7
- 2011 AIME II Problems/Problem 4
- 1992 AIME Problems/Problem 14
- 1988 AIME Problems/Problem 12
- 1989 AIME Problems/Problem 15
- 1985 AIME Problems/Problem 6
- 1971 AHSME Problems/Problem 26
Videos
- The Central NC Math Group's lecture on Mass Points and Barycentric Coordinates
- Video from Double Donut
This article is a stub. Help us out by expanding it.