Difference between revisions of "2025 AIME I Problems/Problem 11"
(→Solution) |
Mathkiddus (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Note that <math>f(x)</math> consists of lines of the form <math>y = x - 4k</math> and <math>y = 4k + 2 - x</math> for integers <math>k</math>. In the first case, we get <math>34y^{2} = y - 4k</math> and the sum of the roots is <math>\tfrac{1}{34}</math> by Vieta. In the second case, we similarly get a sum of <math>-\tfrac{1}{34}.</math> Thus pairing <math>4k</math> and <math>4k+2</math> gives a <math>y</math>-coordinate sum of <math>0.</math> | Note that <math>f(x)</math> consists of lines of the form <math>y = x - 4k</math> and <math>y = 4k + 2 - x</math> for integers <math>k</math>. In the first case, we get <math>34y^{2} = y - 4k</math> and the sum of the roots is <math>\tfrac{1}{34}</math> by Vieta. In the second case, we similarly get a sum of <math>-\tfrac{1}{34}.</math> Thus pairing <math>4k</math> and <math>4k+2</math> gives a <math>y</math>-coordinate sum of <math>0.</math> | ||
− | This process of pairing continues until we get to <math>k = 8</math>. Then <math>y = x - 32</math> behaves exactly as we expect, with a sum of <math>\tfrac{1}{34 | + | This process of pairing continues until we get to <math>k = 8</math>. Then <math>y = x - 32</math> behaves exactly as we expect, with a sum of <math>\tfrac{1}{34}</math>. |
− | + | However, <math>y = 34-x</math> is where things start becoming fishy, since there is one root with absolute value less than <math>1</math> and one with absolute value greater than <math>1</math>. We get <cmath>34-34y^2 = y</cmath> and solving with the quadratic formula (clear to take the positive root) gives <cmath>y = \frac{-1 \pm \sqrt{68^2 + 1}}{68} = \frac{-1 + 5 \sqrt{185}}{68}.</cmath> Adding our <math>\tfrac{1}{34}</math> from earlier gives the answer <math>\frac{1 + 5 \sqrt{185}}{68} \implies \boxed{259}</math>. | |
+ | ~ EpicBird08 ~mathkiddus | ||
==Solution 2== | ==Solution 2== |
Revision as of 19:55, 13 February 2025
Contents
Problem
A piecewise linear function is defined by and
for all real numbers
. The graph of
has the sawtooth pattern depicted below.
The parabola intersects the graph of
at finitely many points. The sum of the
-coordinates of all these intersection points can be expressed in the form
, where
,
,
, and
are positive integers such that
,
,
have greatest common divisor equal to
, and
is not divisible by the square of any prime. Find
.
Graph
It may be helpful to graph certain parts of the graph to grasp a better understanding of what we need and gain some intuition. I created an example diagram on Desmos here: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/ne8shyhyka
~lprado
Solution
Note that consists of lines of the form
and
for integers
. In the first case, we get
and the sum of the roots is
by Vieta. In the second case, we similarly get a sum of
Thus pairing
and
gives a
-coordinate sum of
This process of pairing continues until we get to . Then
behaves exactly as we expect, with a sum of
.
However, is where things start becoming fishy, since there is one root with absolute value less than
and one with absolute value greater than
. We get
and solving with the quadratic formula (clear to take the positive root) gives
Adding our
from earlier gives the answer
.
~ EpicBird08 ~mathkiddus
Solution 2
Drawing the graph, we can use the sawtooth graph provided so nicely by MAA and draw out the parabola . We realize that the sawtooth graph is just a bunch of lines where the positive slope lines are
. The intersections of these lines, along with the parabola are just solving the system of equations:
and
. If we just take
and
, we see that the sum of all
by Vieta's is just
. Similarly, for
, the sum of the roots by Vieta's is also
. So for all the positive slope lines intersecting with the parabola just gives the sum of all
to continuously be
. Okay, now let's look at the negative slope lines. These will have equations of
. Similar to what we did above, we just set each of these equations along with the parabola
. The sum of all
for each of these negative line intersections by Vieta's is
. This keeps going for all of the lines until we reach
. Now, unfortunately, both solutions don't work as the negative solution is out of the range of [1 , 3], [5, 7] and so on. So we just need to take one solution for this and that being the positive one according to the graph. So we just need to solve
which means
. Solving gives
So, the sums of the roots are
+
+
+ .... +
+
+
Nicely all the
terms cancel out leaving with only one
and
So the sum of these two is
From there, the answer is
.
~ilikemath247365
See Also
2025 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 10 |
Followed by Problem 12 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.