Difference between revisions of "Cauchy Induction"
(not a stub) |
m (→Example) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<cmath>\frac{a_1+a_2}{2}\ge\sqrt{a_1a_2}\Leftrightarrow\left(a_1+a_2\right)^2\ge 4a_1a_2\Leftrightarrow\left(a_1-a_2\right)^2\ge0</cmath> | <cmath>\frac{a_1+a_2}{2}\ge\sqrt{a_1a_2}\Leftrightarrow\left(a_1+a_2\right)^2\ge 4a_1a_2\Leftrightarrow\left(a_1-a_2\right)^2\ge0</cmath> | ||
− | Next we show that if AM-GM holds for <math>n</math> variables, it also holds for <math>2n</math> variables: | + | Next, we show that if AM-GM holds for <math>n</math> variables, it also holds for <math>2n</math> variables: |
<cmath>\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{2n}}{2n}=\frac{\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_n}{n}+\frac{a_{n+1}+a_{n+2}+\cdots+a_{2n}}{n}}{2}</cmath> | <cmath>\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{2n}}{2n}=\frac{\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_n}{n}+\frac{a_{n+1}+a_{n+2}+\cdots+a_{2n}}{n}}{2}</cmath> | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
The first inequality follows from <math>n</math>-variable AM-GM, which is true by assumption, and the second inequality follows from 2-variable AM-GM, which is proven above. | The first inequality follows from <math>n</math>-variable AM-GM, which is true by assumption, and the second inequality follows from 2-variable AM-GM, which is proven above. | ||
− | Finally we show that if AM-GM holds for <math>n</math> variables, it also holds for <math>n-1</math> variables. | + | Finally, we show that if AM-GM holds for <math>n</math> variables, it also holds for <math>n-1</math> variables. |
− | By <math>n</math>-variable AM-GM, <math>\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_n}{n}\ge\sqrt[n]{a_1a_2\cdots a_n}</math> | + | By <math>n</math>-variable AM-GM, <math>\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_n}{n}\ge\sqrt[n]{a_1a_2\cdots a_n}</math>. |
− | Let <math>a_n=\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}}{n-1}</math> Then we have | + | Let <math>a_n=\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}}{n-1}</math>. Then we have |
<cmath>\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}+\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}}{n-1}}{n}=\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}}{n-1}</cmath> | <cmath>\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}+\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}}{n-1}}{n}=\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}}{n-1}</cmath> | ||
− | So | + | So |
<cmath>\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}}{n-1}\ge\sqrt[n]{a_1a_2\cdots a_{n-1}\cdot \frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}}{n-1}}</cmath> | <cmath>\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}}{n-1}\ge\sqrt[n]{a_1a_2\cdots a_{n-1}\cdot \frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}}{n-1}}</cmath> | ||
<cmath>\Rightarrow\left(\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}}{n-1}\right)^n\ge a_1a_2\cdots a_{n-1}\cdot \frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}}{n-1}</cmath> | <cmath>\Rightarrow\left(\frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}}{n-1}\right)^n\ge a_1a_2\cdots a_{n-1}\cdot \frac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_{n-1}}{n-1}</cmath> |
Latest revision as of 19:41, 1 February 2025
Cauchy Induction is a beautiful method of "Proof by Induction" discovered by Augustin Louis Cauchy.
Definition
For a given statement over the positive integers greater than or equal to 2, the technique of Cauchy Induction is to prove that
is true, and that
implies
. This implies that
is true for all positive
. Then prove that
implies
. Then
is true for all
.
Along with ,
implying
serves to show that
is true for an arbitrarily large
(in fact,
here can be replaced with
for any
such that
).
implying
serves to show that if
is true for some
, it is true for all positive integers less than
. Because every number is less than some arbitrarily large number, these statements together imply that
is true for all integers
.
Example
The AM-GM Inequality for variables, which states that for positive reals
,
can be proven using Cauchy Induction on
:
The statement is true when because
Next, we show that if AM-GM holds for variables, it also holds for
variables:
The first inequality follows from -variable AM-GM, which is true by assumption, and the second inequality follows from 2-variable AM-GM, which is proven above.
Finally, we show that if AM-GM holds for variables, it also holds for
variables.
By
-variable AM-GM,
.
Let
. Then we have
So
By Cauchy Induction, this proves the AM-GM inequality for variables.