Difference between revisions of "2004 Indonesia MO Problems/Problem 8"
Victorzwkao (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
Victorzwkao (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
<math>q\le p < 2</math>, since p is the sum of <math>{5\choose 2} = 10</math> areas. | <math>q\le p < 2</math>, since p is the sum of <math>{5\choose 2} = 10</math> areas. | ||
− | From the restrictions, we know that the total area = <math>5-p+q-r+s \ge 5-p+r-r+s > 5-2+s = 3+s \ge 3</math>. Thus, Total Covered Area = 5-p+q-r+s > 3, which is a contradiction. | + | From the restrictions, we know that the total area = <math>5-p+q-r+s \ge 5-p+r-r+s > 5-2+s = 3+s \ge 3</math>. Thus, Total Covered Area <math>= 5-p+q-r+s > 3</math>, which is a contradiction. |
Latest revision as of 19:57, 13 September 2024
Problem 8
A floor with an area of will be covered by rugs with various shapes, each having an area of . Show that there exist overlapping rugs with the overlapped area at least .
Solution
Let the first 3 rugs occupy the entire floor, then the next rug that you add in, by the pigeon hole principle, it must overlap with another rug. Let a, b and c be the overlapping region with rug 1, rug 2 and rug 3 respectively, a+b+c = 1, thus at least one of a, b and c must be greater than 0.2.
Solution
Suppose that a, b, c, d, e are the area each rag covers. Then, by principle of inclusion-exclusion,
Let p, q, r, s indicate the area overlapped by at least 2 rags, 3 rags, 4 rags, and 5 rags, respectively, then the above equation can be replaced as
We will use contradiction
Suppose it is indeed possible for an arrangement such that each overlap of 2 or more rags covers less than 0.2 area and the total covered area is equal to 3.
Then, .
Since r represents the sum of 5 intersecting rags, with each overlapped area < 0.2, .
Similarly, , since q is the sum of overlapped area, where each area < 0.2.
, since p is the sum of areas.
From the restrictions, we know that the total area = . Thus, Total Covered Area , which is a contradiction.