Difference between revisions of "SANSKAR'S OG PROBLEMS"
(→Solution 1 (Casework)) |
(→Solution 1 (Casework)) |
||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
Hence, <math>a \le 4</math>. | Hence, <math>a \le 4</math>. | ||
− | '''Subcase 3.1: <math>a=1</math>''' | + | '''Subcase 3.1: <math>b>a=1</math>''' |
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>(10+b)^2=1+b!</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Testing cases, we can see that there is no such <math>b</math>. | ||
'''Subcase 3.2: <math>a=2</math>''' | '''Subcase 3.2: <math>a=2</math>''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>(20+b)^2=2+b!</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Testing cases, we can see that there is no such <math>b</math>. | ||
'''Subcase 3.3: <math>a=3</math>''' | '''Subcase 3.3: <math>a=3</math>''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>(30+b)^2=3+b!</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Testing cases, we can see that there is no such <math>b</math>. | ||
'''Subcase 3.4: <math>a=4</math>''' | '''Subcase 3.4: <math>a=4</math>''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>(40+b)^2=4+b!</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Testing cases, we can see that there is no such <math>b</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We see there is no <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> that satisfy the given equation. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
==Problem2 == | ==Problem2 == | ||
For any [[positive integer]] <math>n</math>, <math>n</math>>1 can <math>n!</math> be a [[perfect square]]? If yes, give one such <math>n</math>. If no, then prove it. | For any [[positive integer]] <math>n</math>, <math>n</math>>1 can <math>n!</math> be a [[perfect square]]? If yes, give one such <math>n</math>. If no, then prove it. |
Revision as of 21:49, 28 January 2024
Hi, this page is created by ...~ SANSGANKRSNGUPTA This page contains exclusive problems made by me myself. I am the creator of these OG problems. What OG stands for is a secret! Please post your solutions with your name. If you view this page please increment the below number by one:
Problem 1
Let be a 2-digit positive integer satisfying . Find .
Solution 1 (Casework)
Case 1:
In this case, we have
.
If , we must have
, but this contradicts the original assumption of , so hence we must have .
With this in mind, we consider the unit digit of .
Subcase 1.1:
In this case, we have that
.
There is no apparent contradiction here, so we leave this as it is.
Subcase 1.2:
In this case, we have that
.
This contradicts with the fact that , so this is impossible.
Subcase 1.3:
In this case, we have that
.
However, this is impossible for all .
Subcase 1.4:
In this case, we have that
.
Again, this yields , which, again, contradicts .
Hence, we must have .
Now, with determined by modular arithmetic, we actually plug in the values.
To simplify future calculations, note that
.
For , this does not hold.
For , this does not hold.
For , this does not hold.
For , this does not hold.
For , this does not hold.
Hence, there is no positive integers and between and inclusive such that .
Case 2:
For this case, we must have
which is impossible if a is a integer and .
Case 3:
In this case, we have
.
If , we must have
which is impossible since and .
Hence, .
Subcase 3.1:
Testing cases, we can see that there is no such .
Subcase 3.2:
Testing cases, we can see that there is no such .
Subcase 3.3:
Testing cases, we can see that there is no such .
Subcase 3.4:
Testing cases, we can see that there is no such .
We see there is no and that satisfy the given equation.
Problem2
For any positive integer , >1 can be a perfect square? If yes, give one such . If no, then prove it.