Difference between revisions of "2018 AMC 10A Problems/Problem 22"
Pi is 3.14 (talk | contribs) m (→Video Solution (Meta-Solving Technique)) |
Mannsnothot (talk | contribs) (Completed the unfinished solution) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
==Solution 3 (Better notation)== | ==Solution 3 (Better notation)== | ||
− | First off, note that <math>24</math>, <math>36</math>, and <math>54</math> are all of the form <math>2^x\times3^y</math>. The prime factorizations are <math>2^3\times 3^1</math>, <math>2^2\times 3^2</math> and <math>2^1\times 3^3</math>, respectively. Now, let <math>a_2</math> and <math>a_3</math> be the number of times <math>2</math> and <math>3</math> go into <math>a</math>,respectively. Define <math>b_2</math>, <math>b_3</math>, <math>c_2</math>, and <math>c_3</math> | + | First off, note that <math>24</math>, <math>36</math>, and <math>54</math> are all of the form <math>2^x\times3^y</math>. The prime factorizations are <math>2^3\times 3^1</math>, <math>2^2\times 3^2</math> and <math>2^1\times 3^3</math>, respectively. Now, let <math>a_2</math> and <math>a_3</math> be the number of times <math>2</math> and <math>3</math> go into <math>a</math>, respectively. Define <math>b_2</math>, <math>b_3</math>, <math>c_2</math>, and <math>c_3</math> similarly. Now, translate the <math>lcm</math>s into the following: |
− | <cmath>\min(a_2,b_2)=3</cmath> <cmath>\min(a_3,b_3)=1</cmath> <cmath>\min(b_2,c_2)=2</cmath> <cmath>\min(b_3,c_3)=2</cmath> <cmath>\min( | + | <cmath>1) \min(a_2,b_2)=3</cmath> <cmath>2) \min(a_3,b_3)=1</cmath> <cmath>3) \min(b_2,c_2)=2</cmath> <cmath>4) \min(b_3,c_3)=2</cmath> <cmath>5) \min(c_2,d_2)=1</cmath> <cmath>6) \min(c_3,d_3)=3</cmath> |
− | ( | + | From <math>4)</math>, we see that <math>b_3 \geq 2</math>, thus from <math>2)</math>, <math>a_3 = 1</math>. Similarly, from <math>3)</math>, <math>c_2 \geq 2</math>, thus from <math>5)</math>, <math>d_2 = 1</math>. |
− | ~Rowechen Zhong | + | |
+ | Note also that <math>d_3 \geq 3</math> and <math>a_2 \geq 3</math>. Therefore <cmath>\min(a_2, d_2) = 1</cmath> <cmath>\min(a_3, d_3) = 1</cmath> Thus, <math>\gcd(a, d) = 2 \times 3 \times k</math> for some <math>k</math> having no factors of <math>2</math> or <math>3</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Since <math>70 < \gcd(a, d) < 100</math>, the only values for k are <math>12, 13, 14, 15, 16</math>, but all have either factors of <math>2</math> or <math>3</math>, except <math>\boxed{\textbf{(D)} 13}</math>. And we're done. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~Rowechen Zhong ~MannsNotHot | ||
==Solution 4 (Fastest)== | ==Solution 4 (Fastest)== |
Latest revision as of 03:51, 6 August 2023
Contents
Problem
Let and be positive integers such that , , , and . Which of the following must be a divisor of ?
Solution 1
The GCD information tells us that divides , both and divide , both and divide , and divides . Note that we have the prime factorizations:
Hence we have for some positive integers . Now if divides , then would be at least which is too large, hence does not divide . Similarly, if divides , then would be at least which is too large, so does not divide . Therefore, where neither nor divide . In other words, is divisible only by primes that are at least . The only possible value of between and and which fits this criterion is , so the answer is .
Solution 2
We can say that and 'have' , that and have , and that and have . Combining and yields has (at a minimum) , and thus has (and no more powers of because otherwise would be different). In addition, has , and thus has (similar to , we see that cannot have any other powers of ). We now assume the simplest scenario, where and . According to this base case, we have . We want an extra factor between the two such that this number is between and , and this new factor cannot be divisible by or . Checking through, we see that is the only one that works. Therefore the answer is
Solution by JohnHankock
Solution 3 (Better notation)
First off, note that , , and are all of the form . The prime factorizations are , and , respectively. Now, let and be the number of times and go into , respectively. Define , , , and similarly. Now, translate the s into the following:
From , we see that , thus from , . Similarly, from , , thus from , .
Note also that and . Therefore Thus, for some having no factors of or .
Since , the only values for k are , but all have either factors of or , except . And we're done.
~Rowechen Zhong ~MannsNotHot
Solution 4 (Fastest)
Notice that , so must be a multiple of . The only answer choice that gives a value between and when multiplied by is . - mathleticguyyy + einstein
In the case where there can be 2 possible answers, we can do casework on ~Williamgolly
Solution 5
Since , and for some positive integers such that and are relatively prime.
Similarly , since , we have and with the same criteria. However, since is not a multiple of , we must contribute an extra to in order to make it a multiple of . So, is a multiple of three, and it is relatively prime to .
Finally, , so using the same logic, is a multiple of and is relatively prime to where .
Since we can't really do anything with these messy expressions, we should try some sample cases of and . Specifically, we let or , and see which one works.
First we let . Note that all of these values of work for the first expression because they are all not divisible by .
Without the loss of generality, we let for all of our sample cases. We can also adjust the value of in , since there is no fixed value for ; there is only a bound.
So we try to make our bound satisfactory. We do so by letting .
Testing our first case and , we find that . To simplify our work, we note that , so for all is equal to .
So now, we can easily find our values of :
We can clearly see that only is in the bound . So, must be a divisor of , which is answer choice .
-FIREDRAGONMATH16
Solution 6
The relationship of , , , and is shown in the above diagram. . , ,
Note that is not required to solve the problem.
Solution 7 (Easier version of Solution 1)
Just as in solution , we prime factorize and to observe that
Substituting these expressions for and into the final given,
The greatest common divisor of these two numbers is already . If is what we wish to multiply by to obtain the gcd of these two numbers, then
. Testing the answer choices, only works for (in order for the compound inequality to hold). so our gcd is , which means that must divide .
-Benedict T (countmath1)
Video Solution by Richard Rusczyk
https://artofproblemsolving.com/videos/amc/2018amc10a/467
~ dolphin7
Video Solution
~savannahsolver
Video Solution by OmegaLearn (Meta-Solving Technique)
https://youtu.be/GmUWIXXf_uk?t=1003
~ pi_is_3.14
See Also
2018 AMC 10A (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 21 |
Followed by Problem 23 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | ||
All AMC 10 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.