Difference between revisions of "2022 USAJMO Problems/Problem 1"
(Created page with "We claim that <math>m</math> satisfies the given conditions if and only if <math>m</math> is squareful. To begin, we let the common difference be <math>d</math> and the commo...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ==Problem== | ||
+ | For which positive integers <math>m</math> does there exist an infinite arithmetic sequence of integers <math>a_1,a_2,\cdots</math> and an infinite geometric sequence of integers <math>g_1,g_2,\cdots</math> satisfying the following properties? | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\bullet</math> <math>a_n-g_n</math> is divisible by <math>m</math> for all integers <math>n>1</math>; | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\bullet</math> <math>a_2-a_1</math> is not divisible by <math>m</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 1== | ||
+ | |||
We claim that <math>m</math> satisfies the given conditions if and only if <math>m</math> is squareful. | We claim that <math>m</math> satisfies the given conditions if and only if <math>m</math> is squareful. | ||
Line 15: | Line 24: | ||
<cmath>g_{l-1}(r-1)^2\equiv0\pmod{m}\text{ (4)}.</cmath> | <cmath>g_{l-1}(r-1)^2\equiv0\pmod{m}\text{ (4)}.</cmath> | ||
− | Whee! Restating, <math>(1),(2)\iff (3),(4)</math>, and the conditions <math>g_{l-1}(r-l)\not\equiv 0\pmod{m}</math> and <math>g_{l-1}(r-1)^2\equiv0\pmod{m}</math> hold if and only if <math>m</math> is | + | Whee! Restating, <math>(1),(2)\iff (3),(4)</math>, and the conditions <math>g_{l-1}(r-l)\not\equiv 0\pmod{m}</math> and <math>g_{l-1}(r-1)^2\equiv0\pmod{m}</math> hold if and only if <math>m</math> is squareful. |
[will finish that step here] | [will finish that step here] |
Revision as of 20:33, 19 April 2022
Problem
For which positive integers does there exist an infinite arithmetic sequence of integers
and an infinite geometric sequence of integers
satisfying the following properties?
is divisible by
for all integers
;
is not divisible by
.
Solution 1
We claim that satisfies the given conditions if and only if
is squareful.
To begin, we let the common difference be and the common ratio be
. Then, rewriting the conditions modulo
gives:
Condition holds iff no consecutive terms in
are equivalent modulo
, which is the same thing as never having consecutive, equal, terms, in
. By Condition
, this is also the same as never having equal, consecutive, terms in
:
Also, Condition holds iff
Whee! Restating, , and the conditions
and
hold if and only if
is squareful.
[will finish that step here]