Difference between revisions of "2016 AMC 10B Problems/Problem 25"
Isabelchen (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 4) |
Isabelchen (talk | contribs) (→Solution 4) |
||
Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
==Solution 4== | ==Solution 4== | ||
− | + | By [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermite%27s_identity Hermite's Identity], | |
− | + | <cmath>\begin{align*} | |
+ | & \lfloor kx \rfloor = \lfloor x \rfloor + \lfloor x + \frac1k \rfloor + \lfloor x + \frac2k \rfloor + \dots + \lfloor x + \frac{k-1}{k} \rfloor\\ | ||
+ | & \lfloor kx \rfloor -k \lfloor x \rfloor = \lfloor x + \frac1k \rfloor + \lfloor x + \frac2k \rfloor + \dots + \lfloor x + \frac{k-1}{k} \rfloor - (k-1) \lfloor x \rfloor | ||
+ | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
+ | Therefore, | ||
<cmath>\begin{align*} | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
\sum_{k=2}^{10}(\lfloor kx \rfloor -k \lfloor x \rfloor) & \\ | \sum_{k=2}^{10}(\lfloor kx \rfloor -k \lfloor x \rfloor) & \\ | ||
&= \sum_{k=2}^{10}(\lfloor x + \frac1k \rfloor + \lfloor x + \frac2k \rfloor + \dots + \lfloor x + \frac{k-1}{k} \rfloor - (k-1) \lfloor x \rfloor)\\ | &= \sum_{k=2}^{10}(\lfloor x + \frac1k \rfloor + \lfloor x + \frac2k \rfloor + \dots + \lfloor x + \frac{k-1}{k} \rfloor - (k-1) \lfloor x \rfloor)\\ | ||
− | &= \sum_{k=2}^{10} | + | &= \sum_{k=2}^{10}\sum_{i=1}^{k-1}( \lfloor x + \frac{i}{k} \rfloor - \lfloor x \rfloor)\\ |
− | &= \sum_{k=2}^{10} | + | &= \sum_{k=2}^{10}\sum_{i=1}^{k-1}( \lfloor \{ x \} + \frac{i}{k} \rfloor) |
\end{align*}</cmath> | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
− | <math>{x} < 1</math>, <math>\frac{j}{k}<1</math> | + | <math>0 \le \{ x \} < 1</math>, <math>0 < \frac{j}{k}<1</math> <math>\Longrightarrow</math> <math>0 < \lfloor \{ x \} + \frac{i}{k} \rfloor < 2</math> <math>\Longrightarrow</math> <math>\lfloor \{ x \} + \frac{i}{k} \rfloor = 0 \text{ or } 1</math> |
+ | |||
+ | <math>\{ x \} + \frac{i}{k} \ge 1</math> <math>\Longrightarrow</math> <math>\{ x \} \ge 1 - \frac{j}{k}</math> | ||
− | <math>1 - \frac{i_n}{k_n} \le {x} < 1- \frac{ | + | Arrange <math>1 - \frac{i_j}{k_j}</math> from small to large, <math>\{ x \}</math> must fall in one interval. WLOG, suppose <math>1 - \frac{i_n}{k_n} \le \{ x \} < 1- \frac{i_{n+1}}{k_{n+1}}</math>. |
if <math>j \le n </math>, | if <math>j \le n </math>, | ||
Line 118: | Line 124: | ||
<cmath>\lfloor \{ x \} + \frac{i_j}{k_j} \rfloor = 0</cmath> | <cmath>\lfloor \{ x \} + \frac{i_j}{k_j} \rfloor = 0</cmath> | ||
− | Therefore, every distinct value <math>\sum_{k=2}^{10} | + | Therefore, every distinct value of <math>\sum_{k=2}^{10}\sum_{i=1}^{k-1}( \lfloor \{ x \} + \frac{i}{k} \rfloor)</math> has one to one correspondence with a distinct value of <math>\frac{i}{k}</math>, <math>\frac{i}{k}</math> is not reducible, <math>(i, k) = 1</math>. |
Using the [[Euler Totient Function]] as in [https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=2016_AMC_10B_Problems/Problem_25#Supplement Solution 1's Supplement], the answer is <math>\fbox{\textbf{(A)}\ 32}</math> | Using the [[Euler Totient Function]] as in [https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=2016_AMC_10B_Problems/Problem_25#Supplement Solution 1's Supplement], the answer is <math>\fbox{\textbf{(A)}\ 32}</math> |
Revision as of 05:46, 27 March 2022
Contents
Problem
Let , where
denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to
. How many distinct values does
assume for
?
Solution 1
Since , we have
The function can then be simplified into
which becomes
We can see that for each value of ,
can equal integers from
to
.
Clearly, the value of changes only when
is equal to any of the fractions
.
So we want to count how many distinct fractions less than have the form
where
. Explanation for this is provided below. We can find this easily by computing
where is the Euler Totient Function. Basically
counts the number of fractions with
as its denominator (after simplification). This comes out to be
.
Because the value of is at least
and can increase
times, there are a total of
different possible values of
.
Explanation:
Arrange all such fractions in increasing order and take a current to study. Let
denote the previous fraction in the list and
(
for each
) be the largest so that
. Since
, we clearly have all
. Therefore, the change must be nonnegative.
But among all numerators coprime to so far,
is the largest. Therefore, choosing
as
increases the value
. Since the overall change in
is positive as fractions
increase, we deduce that all such fractions correspond to different values of the function.
Minor Latex Edits made by MATHWIZARD2010.
Supplement
Here are all the distinct and
When ,
.
When ,
,
.
When ,
,
.
When ,
,
,
,
.
When ,
,
.
When ,
,
,
,
,
,
.
When ,
,
,
,
.
When ,
,
,
,
,
,
.
When ,
,
,
,
.
Solution 2
so we have
Clearly, the value of
changes only when
is equal to any of the fractions
. To get all the fractions,graphing this function gives us
different fractions. But on average,
in each of the
intervals don’t work. This means there are a total of
different possible values of
.
Solution 3 (Casework)
Solution is abstract. In this solution I will give a concrete explanation.
WLOG, for example, when increases from
to
,
will increase from
to
,
will increase from
to
,
will increase from
to
. In total,
will increase by
. Because
, these
numbers are actually
distinct number to cause
to change. In general, when
increases from
to
,
will increse from
to
if
is an integer, and the value of
will change. So the total number of distinct values
could take is equal to the number of distinct values of
, where
and
.
Solution uses Euler Totient Function to count the distinct number of
, I am going to use casework to count the distinct values of
by not counting the duplicate ones.
When ,
,
,
,
When ,
,
,
,
When ,
,
,
,
(
is duplicate)
When ,
,
,
,
When ,
,
(
,
, and
is duplicate)
When ,
,
,
, all the
is duplicate.
,
Solution 4
Therefore,
,
Arrange from small to large,
must fall in one interval. WLOG, suppose
.
if ,
if ,
Therefore, every distinct value of has one to one correspondence with a distinct value of
,
is not reducible,
.
Using the Euler Totient Function as in Solution 1's Supplement, the answer is
Remark
This problem is similar to 1985 AIME Problem 10. Both problems use the Euler Totient Function to find the number of distinct values of .
Video Solution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXJrdDtZNbw
See Also
2016 AMC 10B (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 24 |
Followed by Last Problem | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | ||
All AMC 10 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.