Difference between revisions of "2022 AIME I Problems/Problem 7"
Ihatemath123 (talk | contribs) |
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) (Pushed the bash solution a little.) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Let <math>a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i</math> be distinct integers from <math>1</math> to <math>9.</math> The minimum possible positive value of <cmath>\dfrac{a \cdot b \cdot c - d \cdot e \cdot f}{g \cdot h \cdot i}</cmath> can be written as <math>\frac{m}{n},</math> where <math>m</math> and <math>n</math> are relatively prime positive integers. Find <math>m+n.</math> | Let <math>a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i</math> be distinct integers from <math>1</math> to <math>9.</math> The minimum possible positive value of <cmath>\dfrac{a \cdot b \cdot c - d \cdot e \cdot f}{g \cdot h \cdot i}</cmath> can be written as <math>\frac{m}{n},</math> where <math>m</math> and <math>n</math> are relatively prime positive integers. Find <math>m+n.</math> | ||
− | ==Solution 1 | + | ==Solution 1== |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 2== | ||
Since we are trying to minimize <cmath>\dfrac{a \cdot b \cdot c - d \cdot e \cdot f}{g \cdot h \cdot i},</cmath> we want the numerator to be as small as possible and the denominator as big as possible. One way to do this is to make the numerator one and the denominator as large as possible. This means that <math>a\cdot b\cdot c</math> has to be a different parity than <math>d\cdot e\cdot f.</math> Using this, and reserving <math>9</math> and <math>8</math> for the denominator, we notice that <cmath>\dfrac{2 \cdot 3\cdot 6 - 7 \cdot 1 \cdot 5}{9 \cdot 8 \cdot 4}=\frac{1}{288}.</cmath> | Since we are trying to minimize <cmath>\dfrac{a \cdot b \cdot c - d \cdot e \cdot f}{g \cdot h \cdot i},</cmath> we want the numerator to be as small as possible and the denominator as big as possible. One way to do this is to make the numerator one and the denominator as large as possible. This means that <math>a\cdot b\cdot c</math> has to be a different parity than <math>d\cdot e\cdot f.</math> Using this, and reserving <math>9</math> and <math>8</math> for the denominator, we notice that <cmath>\dfrac{2 \cdot 3\cdot 6 - 7 \cdot 1 \cdot 5}{9 \cdot 8 \cdot 4}=\frac{1}{288}.</cmath> | ||
Since the maximum denominator is <math>9\cdot 8\cdot 7=504,</math> which is less than <math>2\cdot 288,</math> <math>\frac{1}{288}</math> will be less than any other fraction we can come up with with a numerator greater than <math>1.</math> This means that all we need to check is fractions with numerator <math>1</math> and numerator greater than <math>288</math>. The only alternatives we need to consider are <math>9\cdot 8\cdot 6</math> and <math>9\cdot 8\cdot 5</math> in the denominator. The parity restriction allows us to focus on numerators where either <math>a,b,c</math> are all odd or <math>d,e,f</math> are all odd, so our choices are <math>7\cdot 3\cdot 1</math> (paired with either <math>2\cdot 4\cdot 5</math> or <math>2\cdot 4\cdot 6</math>) or <math>5\cdot 3\cdot 1</math>. Neither gives us a numerator of <math>1,</math> so we can conclude that the minimum fraction is <math>\frac{1}{288}</math> and thus the answer is <math>1+288=\boxed{289}</math>. | Since the maximum denominator is <math>9\cdot 8\cdot 7=504,</math> which is less than <math>2\cdot 288,</math> <math>\frac{1}{288}</math> will be less than any other fraction we can come up with with a numerator greater than <math>1.</math> This means that all we need to check is fractions with numerator <math>1</math> and numerator greater than <math>288</math>. The only alternatives we need to consider are <math>9\cdot 8\cdot 6</math> and <math>9\cdot 8\cdot 5</math> in the denominator. The parity restriction allows us to focus on numerators where either <math>a,b,c</math> are all odd or <math>d,e,f</math> are all odd, so our choices are <math>7\cdot 3\cdot 1</math> (paired with either <math>2\cdot 4\cdot 5</math> or <math>2\cdot 4\cdot 6</math>) or <math>5\cdot 3\cdot 1</math>. Neither gives us a numerator of <math>1,</math> so we can conclude that the minimum fraction is <math>\frac{1}{288}</math> and thus the answer is <math>1+288=\boxed{289}</math>. | ||
− | + | ~jgplay | |
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
{{AIME box|year=2022|n=I|num-b=6|num-a=8}} | {{AIME box|year=2022|n=I|num-b=6|num-a=8}} | ||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} |
Revision as of 21:23, 17 February 2022
Contents
Problem
Let be distinct integers from to The minimum possible positive value of can be written as where and are relatively prime positive integers. Find
Solution 1
Solution 2
Since we are trying to minimize we want the numerator to be as small as possible and the denominator as big as possible. One way to do this is to make the numerator one and the denominator as large as possible. This means that has to be a different parity than Using this, and reserving and for the denominator, we notice that Since the maximum denominator is which is less than will be less than any other fraction we can come up with with a numerator greater than This means that all we need to check is fractions with numerator and numerator greater than . The only alternatives we need to consider are and in the denominator. The parity restriction allows us to focus on numerators where either are all odd or are all odd, so our choices are (paired with either or ) or . Neither gives us a numerator of so we can conclude that the minimum fraction is and thus the answer is .
~jgplay
See Also
2022 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 6 |
Followed by Problem 8 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.