Art of Problem Solving
AoPS Online
Math texts, online classes, and more
for students in grades 5-12.
Visit AoPS Online ‚
Books for Grades 5-12 Online Courses
Beast Academy
Engaging math books and online learning
for students ages 6-13.
Visit Beast Academy ‚
Books for Ages 6-13 Beast Academy Online
AoPS Academy
Small live classes for advanced math
and language arts learners in grades 2-12.
Visit AoPS Academy ‚
Find a Physical Campus Visit the Virtual Campus

Difference between revisions of "2021 Fall AMC 12A Problems/Problem 25"
(→‎Solution 3 (Symmetric Congruent Numbers & Interpolation))
Line 84: Line 84:
 
Now, we compute <math>D \left( m \right)</math> for <math>m = 5 , 7 , 9 , 11</math>.
 
Now, we compute <math>D \left( m \right)</math> for <math>m = 5 , 7 , 9 , 11</math>.
  
−
\textbf{Scenario <math>m = 5</math>.}
+
<math>\textbf{Scenario}</math> <math>m = 5</math>.
  
 
We have <math>b_i \in \left\{ - 2 , \cdots , 2 \right\}</math>.
 
We have <math>b_i \in \left\{ - 2 , \cdots , 2 \right\}</math>.
Line 90: Line 90:
 
<math>\textbf{Case 1}</math>
 
<math>\textbf{Case 1}</math>
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 1.1: </math>b_1 = 0<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 1.1}</math>: <math>b_1 = 0</math>
  
 
We cannot have 3 distinct positive integers. So <math>d_{11} \left( 5 \right) = 0</math>.
 
We cannot have 3 distinct positive integers. So <math>d_{11} \left( 5 \right) = 0</math>.
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 1.2: </math>b_2 = 0<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 1.2}</math>: <math>b_2 = 0</math>
  
 
Because there are 2 positive integers, we must have <math>b_3 = 1</math>, <math>b_4 = 2</math>.
 
Because there are 2 positive integers, we must have <math>b_3 = 1</math>, <math>b_4 = 2</math>.
Line 102: Line 102:
 
<math>\textbf{Case 2}</math>
 
<math>\textbf{Case 2}</math>
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 2.1: </math>b_1 > 0<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 2.1}</math>: <math>b_1 > 0</math>
  
 
We cannot have 4 distinct positive integers. So <math>d_{24} \left( 5 \right) = 0</math>.
 
We cannot have 4 distinct positive integers. So <math>d_{24} \left( 5 \right) = 0</math>.
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 2.2: </math>b_1 < 0 < b_2<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 2.2}</math>: <math>b_1 < 0 < b_2</math>
  
 
We cannot have 3 distinct positive integers. So <math>d_{23} \left( 5 \right) = 0</math>.
 
We cannot have 3 distinct positive integers. So <math>d_{23} \left( 5 \right) = 0</math>.
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 2.3: </math>b_2 < 0 < b_3<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 2.3}</math>: <math>b_2 < 0 < b_3</math>
  
 
The only solution is <math>\left( b_1 , b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( - 2 , - 1 , 1 , 2 \right)</math>. So <math>d_{22} \left( 5 \right) = 1</math>.
 
The only solution is <math>\left( b_1 , b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( - 2 , - 1 , 1 , 2 \right)</math>. So <math>d_{22} \left( 5 \right) = 1</math>.
Line 116: Line 116:
 
Therefore, <math>D \left( 5 \right) = 24</math>.
 
Therefore, <math>D \left( 5 \right) = 24</math>.
  
−
<math>\textbf{Scenario </math>m = 7<math>.}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Scenario}</math> <math>m = 7</math>.
  
 
We have <math>b_i \in \left\{ - 3 , \cdots , 3 \right\}</math>.
 
We have <math>b_i \in \left\{ - 3 , \cdots , 3 \right\}</math>.
Line 122: Line 122:
 
<math>\textbf{Case 1}</math>
 
<math>\textbf{Case 1}</math>
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 1.1: </math>b_1 = 0<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 1.1}</math>: <math>b_1 = 0</math>
  
 
We have no feasible solution. Thus, <math>d_{11} \left( 7 \right) = 0</math>.
 
We have no feasible solution. Thus, <math>d_{11} \left( 7 \right) = 0</math>.
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 1.2: </math>b_2 = 0<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 1.2}</math>: <math>b_2 = 0</math>
  
 
The only solution is <math>\left( b_1 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( - 3 , 1 , 2 \right)</math>.
 
The only solution is <math>\left( b_1 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( - 3 , 1 , 2 \right)</math>.
Line 133: Line 133:
 
<math>\textbf{Case 2}</math>
 
<math>\textbf{Case 2}</math>
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 2.1: </math>b_1 > 0<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 2.1}</math>: <math>b_1 > 0</math>
  
 
We cannot have 4 distinct positive integers. So <math>d_{24} \left( 7 \right) = 0</math>.
 
We cannot have 4 distinct positive integers. So <math>d_{24} \left( 7 \right) = 0</math>.
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 2.2: </math>b_1 < 0 < b_2<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 2.2}</math>: <math>b_1 < 0 < b_2</math>
  
 
To get 3 distinct positive integers, we have <math>\left( b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( 1 , 2 , 3 \right)</math>. This implies <math>b_1 = - 6</math>. However, this is out of the range of <math>b_1</math>. So <math>d_{23} \left( 6 \right) = 0</math>.
 
To get 3 distinct positive integers, we have <math>\left( b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( 1 , 2 , 3 \right)</math>. This implies <math>b_1 = - 6</math>. However, this is out of the range of <math>b_1</math>. So <math>d_{23} \left( 6 \right) = 0</math>.
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 2.3: </math>b_2 < 0 < b_3<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 2.3}</math>: <math>b_2 < 0 < b_3</math>
  
 
We have <math>d_{22} \left( 7 \right) = \binom{3}{2} = 3</math>.
 
We have <math>d_{22} \left( 7 \right) = \binom{3}{2} = 3</math>.
Line 147: Line 147:
 
Therefore, <math>D \left( 7 \right) = 24 \cdot 5</math>.
 
Therefore, <math>D \left( 7 \right) = 24 \cdot 5</math>.
  
−
<math>\textbf{Scenario </math>m = 9<math>.}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Scenario}</math> <math>m = 9</math>.
  
 
We have <math>b_i \in \left\{ - 4 , \cdots , 4 \right\}</math>.
 
We have <math>b_i \in \left\{ - 4 , \cdots , 4 \right\}</math>.
Line 153: Line 153:
 
<math>\textbf{Case 1}</math>
 
<math>\textbf{Case 1}</math>
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 1.1: </math>b_1 = 0<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 1.1}</math>: <math>b_1 = 0</math>
  
 
The only solution is <math>\left( b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left(  2, 3, 4 \right)</math>.
 
The only solution is <math>\left( b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left(  2, 3, 4 \right)</math>.
 
Thus, <math>d_{11} \left( 9 \right) = 1</math>.
 
Thus, <math>d_{11} \left( 9 \right) = 1</math>.
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 1.2: </math>b_2 = 0<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 1.2}</math>: <math>b_2 = 0</math>
  
 
The feasible solutions are <math>\left( b_1 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( - 3 , 1 , 2 \right)</math>, <math>\left( - 4 , 1 , 3 \right)</math>.
 
The feasible solutions are <math>\left( b_1 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( - 3 , 1 , 2 \right)</math>, <math>\left( - 4 , 1 , 3 \right)</math>.
Line 165: Line 165:
 
<math>\textbf{Case 2}</math>
 
<math>\textbf{Case 2}</math>
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 2.1: </math>b_1 > 0<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 2.1}</math>: <math>b_1 > 0</math>
  
 
There is no feasible solution. So <math>d_{24} \left( 9 \right) = 0</math>.
 
There is no feasible solution. So <math>d_{24} \left( 9 \right) = 0</math>.
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 2.2: </math>b_1 < 0 < b_2<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 2.2}</math>: <math>b_1 < 0 < b_2</math>
  
 
To get 3 distinct positive integers, we have <math>b_2 + b_3 + b_4 \geq 1 + 2 + 3 = 6</math>. This implies <math>b_1 = - 6</math>. However, this is out of the range of <math>b_1</math>. So <math>d_{23} \left( 9 \right) = 0</math>.
 
To get 3 distinct positive integers, we have <math>b_2 + b_3 + b_4 \geq 1 + 2 + 3 = 6</math>. This implies <math>b_1 = - 6</math>. However, this is out of the range of <math>b_1</math>. So <math>d_{23} \left( 9 \right) = 0</math>.
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 2.3: </math>b_2 < 0 < b_3<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 2.3}</math>: <math>b_2 < 0 < b_3</math>
  
 
We have <math>d_{22} \left( 9 \right) = 8</math>.
 
We have <math>d_{22} \left( 9 \right) = 8</math>.
Line 185: Line 185:
 
<math>\textbf{Case 1}</math>
 
<math>\textbf{Case 1}</math>
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 1.1: </math>b_1 = 0<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 1.1}</math>: <math>b_1 = 0</math>
  
 
The only solution is <math>\left( b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left(  2, 4, 5 \right)</math>.
 
The only solution is <math>\left( b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left(  2, 4, 5 \right)</math>.
 
Thus, <math>d_{11} \left( 11 \right) = 1</math>.
 
Thus, <math>d_{11} \left( 11 \right) = 1</math>.
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 1.2: </math>b_2 = 0<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 1.2}</math>: <math>b_2 = 0</math>
  
 
The feasible solutions are <math>\left( b_1 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( - 3 , 1 , 2 \right)</math>, <math>\left( - 4 , 1 , 3 \right)</math>, <math>\left( - 5 , 1 , 4 \right)</math>, <math>\left( - 5 , 2 , 3 \right)</math>.
 
The feasible solutions are <math>\left( b_1 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( - 3 , 1 , 2 \right)</math>, <math>\left( - 4 , 1 , 3 \right)</math>, <math>\left( - 5 , 1 , 4 \right)</math>, <math>\left( - 5 , 2 , 3 \right)</math>.
Line 197: Line 197:
 
<math>\textbf{Case 2}</math>
 
<math>\textbf{Case 2}</math>
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 2.1: </math>b_1 > 0<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 2.1}</math>: <math>b_1 > 0</math>
  
 
The only feasible solution is <math>\left( b_1 , b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left(  1 , 2, 3, 5 \right)</math>. So <math>d_{24} \left( 11 \right) = 1</math>.
 
The only feasible solution is <math>\left( b_1 , b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left(  1 , 2, 3, 5 \right)</math>. So <math>d_{24} \left( 11 \right) = 1</math>.
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 2.2: </math>b_1 < 0 < b_2<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 2.2}</math>: <math>b_1 < 0 < b_2</math>
  
 
The only feasible solution is <math>\left( b_1 , b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left(  -1 , 3, 4, 5 \right)</math>.  So <math>d_{23} \left( 11 \right) = 1</math>.
 
The only feasible solution is <math>\left( b_1 , b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left(  -1 , 3, 4, 5 \right)</math>.  So <math>d_{23} \left( 11 \right) = 1</math>.
  
−
<math>\textbf{Case 2.3: </math>b_2 < 0 < b_3<math>}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{Case 2.3}</math>: <math>b_2 < 0 < b_3</math>
  
 
We have <math>d_{22} \left( 11 \right) = 16</math>.
 
We have <math>d_{22} \left( 11 \right) = 16</math>.
Line 226: Line 226:
 
Taking <math>\frac{(1.2)-(1.1)}{2}</math>, <math>\frac{(1.3)-(1.2)}{2}</math>, <math>\frac{(1.4)-(1.2)}{2}</math>, we get
 
Taking <math>\frac{(1.2)-(1.1)}{2}</math>, <math>\frac{(1.3)-(1.2)}{2}</math>, <math>\frac{(1.4)-(1.2)}{2}</math>, we get
  
 +
<cmath>
 
\begin{align*}
 
\begin{align*}
 
c_3 109 + c_2 12 + c_1 & = 48 \hspace{1cm} (2.1) \\
 
c_3 109 + c_2 12 + c_1 & = 48 \hspace{1cm} (2.1) \\
Line 231: Line 232:
 
c_3 301 + c_2 20 + c_1 & = 192 \hspace{1cm} (2.3)
 
c_3 301 + c_2 20 + c_1 & = 192 \hspace{1cm} (2.3)
 
\end{align*}
 
\end{align*}
 +
</cmath>
  
 
Taking <math>\frac{(2.2)-(2.1)}{4}</math>, <math>\frac{(2.3)-(2.2)}{4}</math>, we get
 
Taking <math>\frac{(2.2)-(2.1)}{4}</math>, <math>\frac{(2.3)-(2.2)}{4}</math>, we get

Revision as of 21:07, 25 November 2021

Problem

Let $m\ge 5$ be an odd integer, and let $D(m)$ denote the number of quadruples $(a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4)$ of distinct integers with $1\le a_i \le m$ for all $i$ such that $m$ divides $a_1+a_2+a_3+a_4$. There is a polynomial \[q(x) = c_3x^3+c_2x^2+c_1x+c_0\]such that $D(m) = q(m)$ for all odd integers $m\ge 5$. What is $c_1?$

$\textbf{(A)}\ {-}6\qquad\textbf{(B)}\ {-}1\qquad\textbf{(C)}\ 4\qquad\textbf{(D)}\ 6\qquad\textbf{(E)}\ 11$

Solution 1 (Complete Residue System)

For a fixed value of $m,$ there is a total of $m(m-1)(m-2)(m-3)$ possible ordered quadruples $(a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4).$

Let $S=a_1+a_2+a_3+a_4.$ We claim that exactly $\frac1m$ of these $m(m-1)(m-2)(m-3)$ ordered quadruples satisfy that $m$ divides $S:$

Since $\gcd(m,4)=1,$ we conclude that \[\{k+4(0),k+4(1),k+4(2),\ldots,k+4(m-1)\}\] is the complete residue system modulo $m$ for all integers $k.$

Given any ordered quadruple $(a'_1, a'_2, a'_3, a'_4)$ in modulo $m,$ it follows that exactly one of these $m$ ordered quadruples satisfy that $m$ divides $S:$ \[\begin{array}{c|c} & \\ [-2.5ex] \textbf{Ordered Quadruple} & \textbf{Sum Modulo }\boldsymbol{m} \\ [0.5ex] \hline & \\ [-2ex] (a'_1, a'_2, a'_3, a'_4) & S+4(0) \\ [0.5ex] (a'_1+1, a'_2+1, a'_3+1, a'_4+1) & S+4(1) \\ [0.5ex] (a'_1+2, a'_2+2, a'_3+2, a'_4+2) & S+4(2) \\ [0.5ex] \cdots & \cdots \\ [0.5ex] (a'_1+m-1, a'_2+m-1, a'_3+m-1, a'_4+m-1) & S+4(m-1) \\ [0.5ex] \end{array}\] We conclude that $q(m)=\frac1m\cdot[m(m-1)(m-2)(m-3)]=(m-1)(m-2)(m-3),$ so \[q(x)=(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)=c_3x^3+c_2x^2+c_1x+c_0.\] By Vieta's Formulas, we get $c_1=1\cdot2+1\cdot3+2\cdot3=\boxed{\textbf{(E)}\ 11}.$

~MRENTHUSIASM

Solution 2 (Educated Guess)

Note that you see numbers with absolute value $1,6,$ and $11$ in the answer choices. What is special about those numbers? Well, you should notice that they are the coefficients of the polynomial $(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)$ when expanded (if you've already memorized this). Then, you can probably guess the polynomial is some form of $(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)$ whether negative or positive. Since $c_1$ is asked, the answer should be reasoned out as $1 \cdot 2 + 1 \cdot 3 + 2 \cdot 3 = \boxed{\textbf{(E)}\ 11}.$

Furthermore, you can gain confidence in your guess since that is the only answer choice with absolute value $11.$

~fidgetboss_4000

Solution 3 (Symmetric Congruent Numbers & Interpolation)

Define \[ b_i = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} a_i & \mbox{ if } 1 \leq a_i \leq \frac{m-1}{2} \\ a_i - m & \mbox{ if } \frac{m-1}{2} + 1 \leq a_i \leq m - 1 \\ 0 & \mbox{ if } a_i = m \end{array} \right.. \]

Hence, $b_i$ is a one-to-one and onto function of $a_i$, and the range of $b_i$ is $\left\{- \frac{m-1}{2} , \cdots , \frac{m-1}{2} \right\}$.

Therefore, to solve this problem, it is equivalent for us to count the number of tuples $\left( b_1 , b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right)$ that are all distinct and satisfy $m | b_1 + b_2 + b_3 + b_4$.

Denote by $d \left( m \right)$ the number of such tuples that are also subject to the constraint $b_1 < b_2 < b_3 < b_4$.

Hence, $D \left( m \right) = 4! d \left( m \right) = 24 d \left( m \right)$.

We do the following casework analysis to compute $d \left( m \right)$.

$\textbf{Case 1}$: There is one 0 in $\left( b_1 , b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right)$.

Denote by $d_{1i} \left( m \right)$ the number of tuples with $b_i = 0$.

By symmetry, $d_{11} \left( m \right)= d_{14} \left( m \right)$ and $d_{12} \left( m \right)= d_{13} \left( m \right)$.

$\textbf{Case 2}$: There is no 0 in $\left( b_1 , b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right)$.

Denote by $d_{2i} \left( m \right)$ the number of tuples with $i$ positive entries.

By symmetry, $d_{20} \left( m \right) = d_{24} \left( m \right)$ and $d_{21} \left( m \right) = d_{23} \left( m \right)$.

Therefore, \begin{align*} D \left( m \right) & = 24 d \left( m \right) \\ & = 24 \left( \sum_{i=1}^4 d_{1i} \left( m \right) + \sum_{i=0}^4 d_{2i} \left( m \right) \right) \\ & = 24 \left( 2 d_{11} \left( m \right) + 2 d_{12} \left( m \right) + 2 d_{24} \left( m \right) + 2 d_{23} \left( m \right) + d_{22} \left( m \right) \right) . \end{align*}

Now, we compute $D \left( m \right)$ for $m = 5 , 7 , 9 , 11$.

$\textbf{Scenario}$ $m = 5$.

We have $b_i \in \left\{ - 2 , \cdots , 2 \right\}$.

$\textbf{Case 1}$

$\textbf{Case 1.1}$: $b_1 = 0$

We cannot have 3 distinct positive integers. So $d_{11} \left( 5 \right) = 0$.

$\textbf{Case 1.2}$: $b_2 = 0$

Because there are 2 positive integers, we must have $b_3 = 1$, $b_4 = 2$. Hence, $b_1 = - 3$. However, this is out of the range of $b_i$. Thus, $d_{12} \left( 5 \right) = 0$.

$\textbf{Case 2}$

$\textbf{Case 2.1}$: $b_1 > 0$

We cannot have 4 distinct positive integers. So $d_{24} \left( 5 \right) = 0$.

$\textbf{Case 2.2}$: $b_1 < 0 < b_2$

We cannot have 3 distinct positive integers. So $d_{23} \left( 5 \right) = 0$.

$\textbf{Case 2.3}$: $b_2 < 0 < b_3$

The only solution is $\left( b_1 , b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( - 2 , - 1 , 1 , 2 \right)$. So $d_{22} \left( 5 \right) = 1$.

Therefore, $D \left( 5 \right) = 24$.

$\textbf{Scenario}$ $m = 7$.

We have $b_i \in \left\{ - 3 , \cdots , 3 \right\}$.

$\textbf{Case 1}$

$\textbf{Case 1.1}$: $b_1 = 0$

We have no feasible solution. Thus, $d_{11} \left( 7 \right) = 0$.

$\textbf{Case 1.2}$: $b_2 = 0$

The only solution is $\left( b_1 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( - 3 , 1 , 2 \right)$. Thus, $d_{12} \left( 7 \right) = 1$.

$\textbf{Case 2}$

$\textbf{Case 2.1}$: $b_1 > 0$

We cannot have 4 distinct positive integers. So $d_{24} \left( 7 \right) = 0$.

$\textbf{Case 2.2}$: $b_1 < 0 < b_2$

To get 3 distinct positive integers, we have $\left( b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( 1 , 2 , 3 \right)$. This implies $b_1 = - 6$. However, this is out of the range of $b_1$. So $d_{23} \left( 6 \right) = 0$.

$\textbf{Case 2.3}$: $b_2 < 0 < b_3$

We have $d_{22} \left( 7 \right) = \binom{3}{2} = 3$.

Therefore, $D \left( 7 \right) = 24 \cdot 5$.

$\textbf{Scenario}$ $m = 9$.

We have $b_i \in \left\{ - 4 , \cdots , 4 \right\}$.

$\textbf{Case 1}$

$\textbf{Case 1.1}$: $b_1 = 0$

The only solution is $\left( b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( 2, 3, 4 \right)$. Thus, $d_{11} \left( 9 \right) = 1$.

$\textbf{Case 1.2}$: $b_2 = 0$

The feasible solutions are $\left( b_1 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( - 3 , 1 , 2 \right)$, $\left( - 4 , 1 , 3 \right)$. Thus, $d_{12} \left( 9 \right) = 2$.

$\textbf{Case 2}$

$\textbf{Case 2.1}$: $b_1 > 0$

There is no feasible solution. So $d_{24} \left( 9 \right) = 0$.

$\textbf{Case 2.2}$: $b_1 < 0 < b_2$

To get 3 distinct positive integers, we have $b_2 + b_3 + b_4 \geq 1 + 2 + 3 = 6$. This implies $b_1 = - 6$. However, this is out of the range of $b_1$. So $d_{23} \left( 9 \right) = 0$.

$\textbf{Case 2.3}$: $b_2 < 0 < b_3$

We have $d_{22} \left( 9 \right) = 8$.

Therefore, $D \left( 9 \right) = 24 \cdot 14$.

$\textbf{Scenario$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)m = 11$.}$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)

We have $b_i \in \left\{ - 5 , \cdots , 5 \right\}$.

$\textbf{Case 1}$

$\textbf{Case 1.1}$: $b_1 = 0$

The only solution is $\left( b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( 2, 4, 5 \right)$. Thus, $d_{11} \left( 11 \right) = 1$.

$\textbf{Case 1.2}$: $b_2 = 0$

The feasible solutions are $\left( b_1 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( - 3 , 1 , 2 \right)$, $\left( - 4 , 1 , 3 \right)$, $\left( - 5 , 1 , 4 \right)$, $\left( - 5 , 2 , 3 \right)$. Thus, $d_{12} \left( 11 \right) = 4$.

$\textbf{Case 2}$

$\textbf{Case 2.1}$: $b_1 > 0$

The only feasible solution is $\left( b_1 , b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( 1 , 2, 3, 5 \right)$. So $d_{24} \left( 11 \right) = 1$.

$\textbf{Case 2.2}$: $b_1 < 0 < b_2$

The only feasible solution is $\left( b_1 , b_2 , b_3 , b_4 \right) = \left( -1 , 3, 4, 5 \right)$. So $d_{23} \left( 11 \right) = 1$.

$\textbf{Case 2.3}$: $b_2 < 0 < b_3$

We have $d_{22} \left( 11 \right) = 16$.

Therefore, $D \left( 11 \right) = 24 \cdot 30$.

We know that $q \left( m \right) = D \left( m \right)$ for odd $m \geq 5$.

Plugging $m = 5, 7, 9, 11$ into this equation, we get \begin{align*} c_3 5^3 + c_2 5^2 + c_1 5 + c_0 & = 24 \cdot 1 \hspace{1cm} (1.1) \\ c_3 7^3 + c_2 7^2 + c_1 7 + c_0 & = 24 \cdot 5 \hspace{1cm} (1.2) \\ c_3 9^3 + c_2 9^2 + c_1 9 + c_0 & = 24 \cdot 14 \hspace{1cm} (1.3) \\ c_3 11^3 + c_2 11^2 + c_1 11 + c_0 & = 24 \cdot 30 \hspace{1cm} (1.4) \end{align*}

Now, we solve this system of equations. Taking $\frac{(1.2)-(1.1)}{2}$, $\frac{(1.3)-(1.2)}{2}$, $\frac{(1.4)-(1.2)}{2}$, we get

\begin{align*} c_3 109 + c_2 12 + c_1 & = 48 \hspace{1cm} (2.1) \\ c_3 193 + c_2 16 + c_1 & = 108 \hspace{1cm} (2.2) \\ c_3 301 + c_2 20 + c_1 & = 192 \hspace{1cm} (2.3) \end{align*}

Taking $\frac{(2.2)-(2.1)}{4}$, $\frac{(2.3)-(2.2)}{4}$, we get

\begin{align*} c_3 21 + c_2 & = 15 \hspace{1cm} (3.1) \\ c_3 27 + c_2 & = 21 \hspace{1cm} (3.2) \end{align*}

Taking $\frac{(3.2)-(3.1)}{6}$, we get $c_3 = 1$.

Plugging $c_3$ into Equation (3.1), we get $c_2 = - 6$.

Plugging $c_2$ and $c_3$ into Equation (2.1), we get $c_1 = 11$.

Therefore, the answer is $\boxed{\textbf{(E) }11}$.

~Steven Chen (www.professorchenedu.com)

See Also

2021 Fall AMC 12A (Problems • Answer Key • Resources)
Preceded by
Problem 24 		Followed by
Last Problem
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25
All AMC 12 Problems and Solutions

The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions. AMC logo.png

Retrieved from "https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=2021_Fall_AMC_12A_Problems/Problem_25&oldid=166445"