Difference between revisions of "Slalom conjuncture"

m (Changes some things that may cause unnecessary discussion, and also took out my (unintentional, this was way back when my username was a name reveal) name reveal)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<h1>The Slalom Conjuncture</h1>
 
<h1>The Slalom Conjuncture</h1>
<h2>As discovered by Elbertpark</h2>
+
<h2>As discovered by Nickelslordm</h2>
<h3>Written by Elbertpark</h3>
 
<h4>Idea made by Elbertpark...</h4>
 
<h5>and so on</h5>
 
  
 
<h1>What IS the Slalom Conjuncture?</h1>
 
<h1>What IS the Slalom Conjuncture?</h1>
Line 62: Line 59:
 
</table>
 
</table>
 
Notice that most of the squares, even 4001, have only 3 factors.
 
Notice that most of the squares, even 4001, have only 3 factors.
<h1>Proof</h1>
 
Unfortunately, only Doggo and Gmaas have the logical, solid proof to this conjuncture. That is why this is a conjuncture.
 
<h2>Broken proof</h2>
 
For now we can agree that because soon the squares will be growing exponentially, this conjuncture cannot be wrong... yet.
 
  
 
<code> This article is a stub. Help us by expanding it.<code>
 
<code> This article is a stub. Help us by expanding it.<code>

Revision as of 22:02, 7 November 2021

The Slalom Conjuncture

As discovered by Nickelslordm

What IS the Slalom Conjuncture?

The Slalom Conjuncture was discovered during a math assignment. It states that if there is an odd square $n^2$, then this square has a maximum of $n^2 - 2n$ factors starting from 3.

Listed is a table of squares and factors up to 11.

Number $n^2$ # of factors
1 1 1
3 9 3
5 25 3
7 49 3
9 81 5
11 121 3
... ... ...
81 6561 9
4001 16008001 3

Notice that most of the squares, even 4001, have only 3 factors.

This article is a stub. Help us by expanding it.