Difference between revisions of "Vieta's formulas"
(Vieta's formulas moved to Vieta's Formulas) |
Etmetalakret (talk | contribs) (Removed redirect to Vieta's Formulas) (Tag: Removed redirect) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | In [[algebra]], '''Vieta's formulas''' are a set of formulas that relate the coefficients of a [[polynomial]] to its roots. | |
+ | |||
+ | (WIP) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Statement == | ||
+ | Let <math>P(x) = a_n x^n + a_{n-1}x^{n-1} + \cdots + a_1 x + a_0</math> be any polynomial with [[Complex number | complex]] coefficients with roots <math>r_1, r_2, \ldots , r_n</math>, and let <math>s_n</math> be the [[elementary symmetric polynomial]] of the roots with degree <math>n</math>. Vietas formulas then state that <cmath>s_1 = r_1 + r_2 + \cdots + r_n = - \frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n}</cmath> <cmath>s_2 = r_1r_2 + r_1r_3 + \cdots + r_{n-1}r_n = \frac{a_{n-2}}{a_n}</cmath> <cmath>\vdots</cmath> <cmath>s_n = r_1r_2r_3 \cdots r_n = (-1)^n \frac{a_0}{a_n}.</cmath> This can be compactly written as if <math>j</math> is any integer such that <math>0<j<n</math>, then <math>s_j = (-1)^j \frac{a_{n-j}}{a_n}</math>. | ||
+ | == Proof == | ||
+ | By the [[factor theorem]], <math>P(x) = a_n (x-r_1)(x-r_2) \cdots (x-r_n)</math>; we will then prove these formulas by expanding this polynomial. Let <math>j</math> be any integer such that <math>0<j<n</math>. We wish to find a process that generates every term with degree <math>j</math>. If | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <center><math>a_n = a_n</math></center> | ||
+ | <center><math> a_{n-1} = -a_n(r_1+r_2+\cdots+r_n)</math></center> | ||
+ | <center><math> a_{n-2} = a_n(r_1r_2+r_1r_3+\cdots+r_{n-1}r_n)</math></center> | ||
+ | <center><math>\vdots</math></center> | ||
+ | <center><math>a_0 = (-1)^n a_n r_1r_2\cdots r_n</math></center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | More commonly, these are written with the roots on one side and the <math>a_i</math> on the other (this can be arrived at by dividing both sides of all the equations by <math>a_n</math>). | ||
+ | |||
+ | If we denote <math>\sigma_k</math> as the <math>k</math>-th elementary symmetric sum, then we can write those formulas more compactly as <math>\sigma_k = (-1)^k\cdot \frac{a_{n-k}}{a_n{}}</math>, for <math>1\le k\le {n}</math>. | ||
+ | Also, <math>-b/a = p + q, c/a = p \cdot q</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Provide links to problems that use vieta formulas: | ||
+ | Examples: | ||
+ | https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/2017_AMC_12A_Problems/Problem_23 | ||
+ | https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/2010_AMC_10A_Problems/Problem_21 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Proving Vieta's Formula== | ||
+ | Basic proof: | ||
+ | This has already been proved earlier, but I will explain it more. | ||
+ | If we have | ||
+ | <math>x^2+ax+b=(x-p)(x-q)</math>, the roots are <math>p</math> and <math>q</math>. | ||
+ | Now expanding the left side, we get: <math>x^2+ax+b=x^2-qx-px+pq</math>. | ||
+ | Factor out an <math>x</math> on the right hand side and we get: <math>x^2+ax+b=x^2-x(p+q)+pq</math> | ||
+ | Looking at the two sides, we can quickly see that the coefficient <math>a</math> is equal to <math>-(p+q)</math>. <math>p+q</math> is the actual sum of roots, however. Therefore, it makes sense that <math>p+q= \frac{-b}{a}</math>. The same proof can be given for <math>pq=\frac{c}{a}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note: If you do not understand why we must divide by <math>a</math>, try rewriting the original equation as <math>ax^2+bx+c=(x-p)(x-q)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Algebra]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Polynomials]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Theorems]] |
Revision as of 13:41, 5 November 2021
In algebra, Vieta's formulas are a set of formulas that relate the coefficients of a polynomial to its roots.
(WIP)
Statement
Let be any polynomial with complex coefficients with roots , and let be the elementary symmetric polynomial of the roots with degree . Vietas formulas then state that This can be compactly written as if is any integer such that , then .
Proof
By the factor theorem, ; we will then prove these formulas by expanding this polynomial. Let be any integer such that . We wish to find a process that generates every term with degree . If
More commonly, these are written with the roots on one side and the on the other (this can be arrived at by dividing both sides of all the equations by ).
If we denote as the -th elementary symmetric sum, then we can write those formulas more compactly as , for . Also, .
Provide links to problems that use vieta formulas: Examples: https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/2017_AMC_12A_Problems/Problem_23 https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/2010_AMC_10A_Problems/Problem_21
Proving Vieta's Formula
Basic proof: This has already been proved earlier, but I will explain it more. If we have , the roots are and . Now expanding the left side, we get: . Factor out an on the right hand side and we get: Looking at the two sides, we can quickly see that the coefficient is equal to . is the actual sum of roots, however. Therefore, it makes sense that . The same proof can be given for .
Note: If you do not understand why we must divide by , try rewriting the original equation as