Difference between revisions of "2021 AIME II Problems/Problem 9"
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 1: Minor edits on uppercases. Also, I reformatted the equation block so that it appears much nicer.) |
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) (Prioritize the comprehensive solution. Also, made the solution more result-driven by separating the solutions and the important results.) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Solution 1== | ==Solution 1== | ||
+ | This solution refers to the <b>Remarks</b> section. | ||
+ | |||
+ | By the Euclidean Algorithm, we have <cmath>\gcd\left(2^m+1,2^m-1\right)=\gcd\left(2,2^m-1\right)=1.</cmath> | ||
+ | We are given that <math>\gcd\left(2^m+1,2^n-1\right)>1.</math> Multiplying both sides by <math>\gcd\left(2^m-1,2^n-1\right)</math> gives | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
+ | \gcd\left(2^m+1,2^n-1\right)\cdot\gcd\left(2^m-1,2^n-1\right)&>\gcd\left(2^m-1,2^n-1\right) \\ | ||
+ | \gcd\left(\left(2^m+1\right)\left(2^m-1\right),2^n-1\right)&>\gcd\left(2^m-1,2^n-1\right) \hspace{12mm} &&\text{by }\textbf{Claim 2} \\ | ||
+ | \gcd\left(2^{2m}-1,2^n-1\right)&>\gcd\left(2^m-1,2^n-1\right) \\ | ||
+ | 2^{\gcd(2m,n)}-1&>2^{\gcd(m,n)}-1 &&\text{by }\textbf{Claim 1} \\ | ||
+ | \gcd(2m,n)&>\gcd(m,n), | ||
+ | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
+ | which implies that <math>n</math> must have more factors of <math>2</math> than <math>m</math> does. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We construct the following table for the first <math>30</math> positive integers: | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{array}{c|c|c} | ||
+ | && \\ [-2.5ex] | ||
+ | \boldsymbol{\#}\textbf{ of Factors of }\boldsymbol{2} & \textbf{Numbers} & \textbf{Count} \\ | ||
+ | \hline | ||
+ | && \\ [-2.25ex] | ||
+ | 0 & 1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17,19,21,23,25,27,29 & 15 \\ | ||
+ | && \\ [-2.25ex] | ||
+ | 1 & 2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30 & 8 \\ | ||
+ | && \\ [-2.25ex] | ||
+ | 2 & 4,12,20,28 & 4 \\ | ||
+ | && \\ [-2.25ex] | ||
+ | 3 & 8,24 & 2 \\ | ||
+ | && \\ [-2.25ex] | ||
+ | 4 & 16 & 1 \\ | ||
+ | \end{array}</cmath> | ||
+ | To count the ordered pairs <math>(m,n),</math> we perform casework on the number of factors of <math>2</math> that <math>m</math> has: | ||
+ | <ol style="margin-left: 1.5em;"> | ||
+ | <li>If <math>m</math> has <math>0</math> factors of <math>2,</math> then <math>m</math> has <math>15</math> options and <math>n</math> has <math>8+4+2+1=15</math> options. So, this case has <math>15\cdot15=225</math> ordered pairs.</li><p> | ||
+ | <li>If <math>m</math> has <math>1</math> factor of <math>2,</math> then <math>m</math> has <math>8</math> options and <math>n</math> has <math>4+2+1=7</math> options. So, this case has <math>8\cdot7=56</math> ordered pairs.</li><p> | ||
+ | <li>If <math>m</math> has <math>2</math> factors of <math>2,</math> then <math>m</math> has <math>4</math> options and <math>n</math> has <math>2+1=3</math> options. So, this case has <math>4\cdot3=12</math> ordered pairs.</li><p> | ||
+ | <li>If <math>m</math> has <math>3</math> factors of <math>2,</math> then <math>m</math> has <math>2</math> options and <math>n</math> has <math>1</math> option. So, this case has <math>2\cdot1=2</math> ordered pairs.</li> | ||
+ | </ol> | ||
+ | Together, the answer is <math>225+56+12+2=\boxed{295}.</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~MRENTHUSIASM | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 2== | ||
We make use of the (Olympiad Number Theory) lemma that <math>\gcd(2^a-1,2^b-1)=2^{\gcd(a,b)}-1</math>. | We make use of the (Olympiad Number Theory) lemma that <math>\gcd(2^a-1,2^b-1)=2^{\gcd(a,b)}-1</math>. | ||
Line 16: | Line 57: | ||
~Lcz | ~Lcz | ||
− | == | + | ==Remarks== |
− | ===Claim ( | + | ===Claim 1 (Olympiad Number Theory Lemma)=== |
If <math>u,a,</math> and <math>b</math> are positive integers such that <math>u\geq2,</math> then <math>\gcd\left(u^a-1,u^b-1\right)=u^{\gcd(a,b)}-1.</math> | If <math>u,a,</math> and <math>b</math> are positive integers such that <math>u\geq2,</math> then <math>\gcd\left(u^a-1,u^b-1\right)=u^{\gcd(a,b)}-1.</math> | ||
Line 24: | Line 65: | ||
~MRENTHUSIASM | ~MRENTHUSIASM | ||
− | ===Proof 1 (Euclidean Algorithm)=== | + | ===Claim 1 Proof 1 (Euclidean Algorithm)=== |
If <math>a=b,</math> then <math>\gcd(a,b)=a=b,</math> from which the claim is clearly true. | If <math>a=b,</math> then <math>\gcd(a,b)=a=b,</math> from which the claim is clearly true. | ||
Line 40: | Line 81: | ||
~MRENTHUSIASM | ~MRENTHUSIASM | ||
− | ===Proof 2 (Bézout's Identity)=== | + | ===Claim 1 Proof 2 (Bézout's Identity)=== |
Let <math>d=\gcd\left(u^a-1,u^b-1\right).</math> It follows that <math>u^a\equiv1\pmod{d}</math> and <math>u^b\equiv1\pmod{d}.</math> | Let <math>d=\gcd\left(u^a-1,u^b-1\right).</math> It follows that <math>u^a\equiv1\pmod{d}</math> and <math>u^b\equiv1\pmod{d}.</math> | ||
Line 55: | Line 96: | ||
~MRENTHUSIASM | ~MRENTHUSIASM | ||
− | === | + | ===Claim 2 (GCD Property)=== |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
For positive integers <math>r,s,</math> and <math>t,</math> if <math>\gcd(r,s)=1,</math> then <math>\gcd(r,t)\cdot\gcd(s,t)=\gcd(rs,t).</math> | For positive integers <math>r,s,</math> and <math>t,</math> if <math>\gcd(r,s)=1,</math> then <math>\gcd(r,t)\cdot\gcd(s,t)=\gcd(rs,t).</math> | ||
Revision as of 09:54, 26 August 2021
Contents
Problem
Find the number of ordered pairs such that
and
are positive integers in the set
and the greatest common divisor of
and
is not
.
Solution 1
This solution refers to the Remarks section.
By the Euclidean Algorithm, we have
We are given that
Multiplying both sides by
gives
which implies that
must have more factors of
than
does.
We construct the following table for the first positive integers:
To count the ordered pairs
we perform casework on the number of factors of
that
has:
- If
has
factors of
then
has
options and
has
options. So, this case has
ordered pairs.
- If
has
factor of
then
has
options and
has
options. So, this case has
ordered pairs.
- If
has
factors of
then
has
options and
has
options. So, this case has
ordered pairs.
- If
has
factors of
then
has
options and
has
option. So, this case has
ordered pairs.
Together, the answer is
~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution 2
We make use of the (Olympiad Number Theory) lemma that .
Noting , we have (by difference of squares)
It is now easy to calculate the answer (with casework on
) as
.
~Lcz
Remarks
Claim 1 (Olympiad Number Theory Lemma)
If and
are positive integers such that
then
There are two proofs to this claim, as shown below.
~MRENTHUSIASM
Claim 1 Proof 1 (Euclidean Algorithm)
If then
from which the claim is clearly true.
Otherwise, let without the loss of generality. For all integers
and
such that
the Euclidean Algorithm states that
We apply this result repeatedly to reduce the larger number:
Continuing, we have
from which the proof is complete.
~MRENTHUSIASM
Claim 1 Proof 2 (Bézout's Identity)
Let It follows that
and
By Bézout's Identity, there exist integers and
such that
so
from which
We know that
Next, we notice that
Since
is a common divisor of
and
we conclude that
from which the proof is complete.
~MRENTHUSIASM
Claim 2 (GCD Property)
For positive integers and
if
then
As and
are relatively prime (have no prime divisors in common), this property is intuitive.
~MRENTHUSIASM
See Also
2021 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 8 |
Followed by Problem 10 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.