Difference between revisions of "2021 AIME II Problems/Problem 9"
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) m (→Solution (Detailed Explanation of Solution 1)) |
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) m (→Solution (Detailed Explanation of Solution 1)) |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
===Solution (Detailed Explanation of Solution 1)=== | ===Solution (Detailed Explanation of Solution 1)=== | ||
− | By the Euclidean Algorithm, we have <cmath>\gcd\left(2^m+1,2^m-1\right)=\gcd\left(2^m-1,2\right)=1.</cmath> | + | By the Euclidean Algorithm, we have <cmath>\gcd\left(2^m+1,2^m-1\right)=\gcd\left(2^m-1,2\right)=1. \hspace{40mm} (*)</cmath> |
− | We are given that <math>\gcd\left(2^m+1,2^n-1\right)>1.</math> Multiplying both sides by <math>\gcd\left(2^m-1,2^n-1\right)</math> gives <cmath>\gcd\left(2^m+1,2^n-1\right)\cdot\gcd\left(2^m-1,2^n-1\right)>\gcd\left(2^m-1,2^n-1\right).</cmath> | + | We are given that <math>\gcd\left(2^m+1,2^n-1\right)>1.</math> Multiplying both sides by <math>\gcd\left(2^m-1,2^n-1\right)</math> gives <cmath>\gcd\left(2^m+1,2^n-1\right)\cdot\gcd\left(2^m-1,2^n-1\right)>\gcd\left(2^m-1,2^n-1\right). \hspace{4.725mm} (**)</cmath> |
+ | By <math>(*)</math> and <b>Remark (GCD Fact)</b>, we rewrite <math>(**)</math> as | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
+ | \gcd\left(\left(2^m+1\right)\left(2^m-1\right),2^n-1\right)&>\gcd\left(2^m-1,2^n-1\right) \\ | ||
+ | \gcd\left(2^{2m}-1,2^n-1\right)&>\gcd\left(2^m-1,2^n-1\right). \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
<b>Solution in progress. A million thanks for not editing.</b> | <b>Solution in progress. A million thanks for not editing.</b> |
Revision as of 06:58, 1 April 2021
Contents
Problem
Find the number of ordered pairs such that and are positive integers in the set and the greatest common divisor of and is not .
Solution 1
We make use of the (olympiad number theory) lemma that .
Noting , we have (by difference of squares) It is now easy to calculate the answer (with casework on ) as .
~Lcz
Solution 2 (Generalized and Comprehensive)
Claim (Solution 1's Lemma)
If and are positive integers with then
There are two proofs to this claim, as shown below.
~MRENTHUSIASM
Proof 1 (Euclidean Algorithm)
If then from which the claim is clearly true.
Otherwise, let without the loss of generality. Note that for all integers the Euclidean Algorithm states that We apply this result repeatedly to reduce the larger number: Continuing, we have from which the proof is complete.
~MRENTHUSIASM
Proof 2 (Bézout's Identity)
Let It follows that and
By Bézout's Identity, there exist integers and for which thus from which We know that
Notice that Since is a common divisor of and we conclude that from which the proof is complete.
~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution (Detailed Explanation of Solution 1)
By the Euclidean Algorithm, we have We are given that Multiplying both sides by gives By and Remark (GCD Fact), we rewrite as
Solution in progress. A million thanks for not editing.
~MRENTHUSIASM
Remark (GCD Fact)
In of the solution, we use the following fact:
For positive integers and if then
As and are relatively prime (have no prime factors in common), this fact is intuitive.
~MRENTHUSIASM
See Also
2021 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 8 |
Followed by Problem 10 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.