Difference between revisions of "2021 AIME II Problems/Problem 6"
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 3 (Casework Bash)) |
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 3 (Casework Bash)) |
||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
5 & \left(|A|-5\right)\cdot\left(|B|-5\right)=0 & \text{either } |A|=5, |B|=5, \text{ or both} \\ [0.5ex] | 5 & \left(|A|-5\right)\cdot\left(|B|-5\right)=0 & \text{either } |A|=5, |B|=5, \text{ or both} \\ [0.5ex] | ||
\end{array}</cmath> | \end{array}</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ... Steps will be written very soon ... | ||
+ | |||
+ | Two solutions follow from here: | ||
+ | ===Solution 3.1 (Combinatorial Identities)=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Solution 3.2 (Hard Calculations)=== | ||
<b>SOLUTION IN PROGRESS. NO EDIT PLEASE--A MILLION THANKS!</b> | <b>SOLUTION IN PROGRESS. NO EDIT PLEASE--A MILLION THANKS!</b> |
Revision as of 13:01, 24 March 2021
Contents
Problem
For any finite set , let denote the number of elements in . FInd the number of ordered pairs such that and are (not necessarily distinct) subsets of that satisfy
Solution 1
By PIE, , and after some algebra you see that we need or . WLOG , then for each element there are possibilities, either it is in both and , it is in but not , or it is in neither nor . This gives us possibilities, and we multiply by since it could of also been the other way around. Now we need to subtract the overlaps where , and this case has ways that could happen. It is because each number could be in the subset or it could not be in the subset. So the final answer is .
~ math31415926535
Solution 2
We denote . We denote , , , .
Therefore, and the intersection of any two out of sets , , , is an empty set. Therefore, is a partition of .
Following from our definition of , , , we have .
Therefore, the equation
can be equivalently written as
This equality can be simplified as
Therefore, we have the following three cases: (1) and , (2) and , (3) . Next, we analyze each of these cases, separately.
Case 1: and .
In this case, to count the number of solutions, we do the complementary counting.
First, we count the number of solutions that satisfy .
Hence, each number in falls into exactly one out of these three sets: , , . Following from the rule of product, the number of solutions is .
Second, we count the number of solutions that satisfy and .
Hence, each number in falls into exactly one out of these two sets: , . Following from the rule of product, the number of solutions is .
Therefore, following from the complementary counting, the number of solutions in this case is equal to the number of solutions that satisfy minus the number of solutions that satisfy and , i.e., .
Case 2: and .
This case is symmetric to Case 1. Therefore, the number of solutions in this case is the same as the number of solutions in Case 1, i.e., .
Case 3: and .
Recall that this is one part of our analysis in Case 1. Hence, the number solutions in this case is .
By putting all cases together, following from the rule of sum, the total number of solutions is equal to
~ Steven Chen (www.professorchenedu.com)
Solution 3 (Casework Bash)
By the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion (abbreviated PIE), we have from which we rewrite the given equation as Rearranging and applying Simon's Favorite Factoring Trick give We will use casework on the value of
... Steps will be written very soon ...
Two solutions follow from here:
Solution 3.1 (Combinatorial Identities)
Solution 3.2 (Hard Calculations)
SOLUTION IN PROGRESS. NO EDIT PLEASE--A MILLION THANKS!
~MRENTHUSIASM
See Also
2021 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 5 |
Followed by Problem 7 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.