Difference between revisions of "2016 USAJMO Problems/Problem 2"
(→See also) |
Tigerzhang (talk | contribs) (→Motivation for Solution) |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
From this, Euler's Theorem comes to mind and we see that if <math>n-20 = \varphi\left(2^{20}\right)</math>, the equality is satisfied. Thus, we get that <math>n = 20 + 2^{19}</math>, which is less than <math>10^6</math>, and we should be done. However, this requires slightly more formalization, and can be proven directly more easily if <math>n = 20+2^{19}</math> is known or suspected. | From this, Euler's Theorem comes to mind and we see that if <math>n-20 = \varphi\left(2^{20}\right)</math>, the equality is satisfied. Thus, we get that <math>n = 20 + 2^{19}</math>, which is less than <math>10^6</math>, and we should be done. However, this requires slightly more formalization, and can be proven directly more easily if <math>n = 20+2^{19}</math> is known or suspected. | ||
+ | ==Solution 2== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We divide the positive numbers into <math>999999</math> groups. | ||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{USAJMO newbox|year=2016|num-b=1|num-a=3}} | {{USAJMO newbox|year=2016|num-b=1|num-a=3}} |
Revision as of 13:39, 29 June 2020
Problem
Prove that there exists a positive integer such that has six consecutive zeros in its decimal representation.
Solution
Let digit of a number be the units digit, digit be the tens digit, and so on. Let the 6 consecutive zeroes be at digits through digit . The criterion is then obviously equivalent to
We will prove that satisfies this, thus proving the problem statement (since ).
We want
( is the Euler Totient Function.) By Euler's Theorem, since gcd = 1,
so
Since , so
for and , and thus the problem statement has been proven.
Motivation for Solution
Modifying our necessary and sufficient inequality, we get:
Since gcd if (which is obviously true) and which is also true given that , we need the RHS to be greater than :
The first that satisfies this inequality is , so we let :
From this, Euler's Theorem comes to mind and we see that if , the equality is satisfied. Thus, we get that , which is less than , and we should be done. However, this requires slightly more formalization, and can be proven directly more easily if is known or suspected.
Solution 2
We divide the positive numbers into groups. The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.
See also
2016 USAJMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
Followed by Problem 3 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAJMO Problems and Solutions |