Difference between revisions of "Sum Product Conjecture"
(Created page with "[size=500][center]The Sum Product Conjecture[/center][/size] Step 1: Pick a number <math>n</math>. Step 2: Let <math>S(n)</math> be the sum of the digits of <math>n</math>. S...") |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[color=#f00][b]Lemma.[/b][/color] For all <math>k\geq 4</math>, <math>\tfrac{81}4k^2<10^{k-1}</math>. | [color=#f00][b]Lemma.[/b][/color] For all <math>k\geq 4</math>, <math>\tfrac{81}4k^2<10^{k-1}</math>. | ||
− | [i]Proof | + | [i]Proof by djmathman:[/i] Proceed by induction. The case <math>k=4</math> can be computed by hand, since <math>\tfrac{81}4\cdot 4^2 = 324 < 1000</math>. For the inductive step, write |
\[ | \[ | ||
\tfrac{81}4(k+1)^2 = \tfrac{81}4k^2\cdot(\tfrac{k+1}k)^2 \stackrel{\textrm{(IH)}}<10^{k-1}\cdot 2^2\leq 10^k, | \tfrac{81}4(k+1)^2 = \tfrac{81}4k^2\cdot(\tfrac{k+1}k)^2 \stackrel{\textrm{(IH)}}<10^{k-1}\cdot 2^2\leq 10^k, |
Latest revision as of 09:47, 12 June 2020
[size=500][center]The Sum Product Conjecture[/center][/size]
Step 1: Pick a number .
Step 2: Let
be the sum of the digits of
.
Step 3: Find the solution to
such that
and
is as close to
as possible. Now your number is
.
Repeat.
[b]The Sum-Product Conjecture[/b] states that you will eventually end up at 0 or 4.
[list]
[*][b]Claim 1:[/b] Going through all these steps, you will eventually end up at a one-digit integer.
First, we prove that we will eventually reach a number with less than four digits, and then we will prove the for a number less than or equal to 4 digits, that it will eventually reach a previous case and onto the 1 digit cases, which is proved below.
[color=#f00][b]Lemma.[/b][/color] For all ,
.
[i]Proof by djmathman:[/i] Proceed by induction. The case can be computed by hand, since
. For the inductive step, write
\[
\tfrac{81}4(k+1)^2 = \tfrac{81}4k^2\cdot(\tfrac{k+1}k)^2 \stackrel{\textrm{(IH)}}<10^{k-1}\cdot 2^2\leq 10^k,
\]
where in the second-to-last equality we use the fact that
for all positive integers
.
To proceed, observe now that, by the AM-GM inequality,
\[
ab\leq \left(\frac{a+b}2\right)^2= \frac{S(n)^2}4.
\]
We now split into cases.
[list]
[*][b]Case 1.[/b] If has two digits, then
, so in accordance with your notation
. Using this value as our new value of
, we get
, so
; then
, so
; then
, so
; then
, so
; then
, so
.
Unfortunately, we can't press on using this logic anymore, so we need to brute-force this part:
[list]
[*] For ,
is at most
, so
is a single-digit integer.
[*] For
,
, so
. Then we're in the previous case.
[*] For
,
, so
. Then we're in the previous case.
[*] For
,
, so
. Then we're in the very first case.
[*] For
,
, so
. Then we're in the second case.
[*] For
,
, so
. Then we're in the very first case.
[/list]
[*][b]Case 2.[/b] Suppose
has three digits. Then
, so
. In turn, using
as our new value of
,
, so
. Now we're in Case 1.
[*][b]Case 3.[/b] Finally, suppose
has at least
digits. Choose
such that
, noting that
. Then
is at most
(when all
digits are nines), and so
\[
ab\leq \frac{S(n)^2}4 \leq \frac{(9k)^2}4 = \frac{81}4k^2 \stackrel{(*)}< 10^{k-1} \leq n.
\][/list]
This means that the process strictly decreases the value of
. Hence, after a finite number of iterations, our integer will have fewer than
digits, which reduces the problem to one of the previous few cases.
[*][b]Claim 2:[/b] If your number is a one-digit integer, then you will end up 0 or 4.
[list]
[*][b]Proof: The sum of the digits of one-digit integers is itself.[/b]
[list]
[*]Case 1: 1. We have
, so that
and
(symmetry,
and
is the same), so that
. We have ended at 0, and we repeat, finding the
and
, so that we end up at
again.
[*]Case 2: 2. We have that
, and
and
, and
. We already proved it for 1, so this is done
[*]Case 3: 3. We have that
, so that
,
, but we already proved it for 2, and we are done.
[*]Case 4: 4. We have that
, so that
, and we end up at
again.
[*]Case 5: 5. We have that
, and
, so that
. Now, we have
,
, so that
. Now, we have
,
, and
.
, we already proved it for 2, and we are done. This step also proves it for
and
because we went through 6 at one step.
[*]Case 6: 6. We are done because of Case 5.
[*]Case 7: 7. We have
,
, so that
. Sum of digits is 3, and we already proved it for 3, so we are done.
[*]Case 8: 8. We have that
, and
, so that
. Sum of digits is
, but we already proved it for
, so we are done.
[*]Case 9: 9. We are done because of Case 5.
[/list]
[/list]
[/list]
We have proved this claim. Q.E.D.