Difference between revisions of "2002 AIME I Problems/Problem 4"
Made in 2016 (talk | contribs) m (Changed the wording a tiny bit again to make it clearer.) |
Keeper1098 (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Consider the sequence defined by <math>a_k =\dfrac{1}{k^2+k}</math> for <math>k\geq 1</math>. Given that <math>a_m+a_{m+1}+\cdots+a_{n-1}=\dfrac{1}{29}</math>, for positive integers <math>m</math> and <math>n</math> with <math>m<n</math>, find <math>m+n</math>. | Consider the sequence defined by <math>a_k =\dfrac{1}{k^2+k}</math> for <math>k\geq 1</math>. Given that <math>a_m+a_{m+1}+\cdots+a_{n-1}=\dfrac{1}{29}</math>, for positive integers <math>m</math> and <math>n</math> with <math>m<n</math>, find <math>m+n</math>. | ||
− | == Solution == | + | == Solution 1 == |
<math>\dfrac{1}{k^2+k}=\dfrac{1}{k(k+1)}=\dfrac{1}{k}-\dfrac{1}{k+1}</math>. Thus, | <math>\dfrac{1}{k^2+k}=\dfrac{1}{k(k+1)}=\dfrac{1}{k}-\dfrac{1}{k+1}</math>. Thus, | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
*If <math>m=29t</math>, a similar argument to the one above implies <math>m=29(28)</math> and <math>n=28</math>, which implies <math>m>n</math>. This is impossible since <math>n-m>0</math>. | *If <math>m=29t</math>, a similar argument to the one above implies <math>m=29(28)</math> and <math>n=28</math>, which implies <math>m>n</math>. This is impossible since <math>n-m>0</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Solution 2 == | ||
+ | Note that <math>a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_i = \dfrac{i}{i+1}</math>. This can be proven by induction. Thus, <math></math>\sum_{i=m}^{\n-1} a_i<math> = </math>\sum_{i=1}^{\n-1} a_i<math> - </math>\sum_{i=1}^{\m-1} a_i<math> = \dfrac{n-1}{n} - \dfrac{m-1}{m} = \dfrac{n-m}{mn} = 1/29.</math> Cross-multiplying yields <math>29n - 29m - mn = 0</math>, and adding <math>29^2</math> to both sides gives <math>(29-m)(29+n) = 29^2</math>. Clearly, since <math>m < n</math>, <math>29-m = 1</math> and <math>29+n</math> = <math>29^2</math>. Hence, <math>m = 28</math>, <math>n = 812</math>, and <math>m+n = \fbox{840}</math>. | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
{{AIME box|year=2002|n=I|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | {{AIME box|year=2002|n=I|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | ||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} |
Revision as of 17:59, 4 May 2020
Contents
Problem
Consider the sequence defined by for . Given that , for positive integers and with , find .
Solution 1
. Thus,
Which means that
Since we need a factor of 29 in the denominator, we let .* Substituting, we get
so
Since is an integer, , so . It quickly follows that and , so .
*If , a similar argument to the one above implies and , which implies . This is impossible since .
Solution 2
Note that . This can be proven by induction. Thus, $$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)\sum_{i=m}^{\n-1} a_i\sum_{i=1}^{\n-1} a_i\sum_{i=1}^{\m-1} a_i Cross-multiplying yields , and adding to both sides gives . Clearly, since , and = . Hence, , , and .
See also
2002 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
Followed by Problem 5 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.