Difference between revisions of "User talk:JBL"
Eyefragment (talk | contribs) (Re: Problem Solving) |
(→Re: Problem Solving) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Since I've never really seen Bijection/Injection/Surjection show up as anything but useful terminology, I wasn't sure if they'd be in line with what was on those pages, since I definitely got the impression that the wiki's main goal was to be an accessible problem solving resource [I'm fine going in any direction (dictionary, problem solving, or both), myself]. ~eyefragment | Since I've never really seen Bijection/Injection/Surjection show up as anything but useful terminology, I wasn't sure if they'd be in line with what was on those pages, since I definitely got the impression that the wiki's main goal was to be an accessible problem solving resource [I'm fine going in any direction (dictionary, problem solving, or both), myself]. ~eyefragment | ||
+ | |||
+ | I'm happy defining those terms there, but I agree that there's not a whole lot to do with them outside of giving examples. |
Revision as of 16:28, 1 December 2006
About CMO
I am sorry about CMO. What do you suggest I should do? Redirect? Recreate the pages? By the way "Cyprus Mathematical Olympiad" it is the official translation. The papers are in both English and Greek.
message
oh. i didn't know that AMC 8 wasn't hyphenated. --Anirudh 19:57, 11 November 2006 (EST)
are you a SYSOP?--Anirudh 17:06, 12 November 2006 (EST)
how do you become an sysop
Re: Problem Solving
Ah, I got the impression that we were targeting problem solving specifically from the following:
On What AoPSWiki is not: AoPSWiki is not a dictionary Most articles should contain a definition of the term, but the definition by itself should not make up the whole article. The articles should provide a more complete, thorough explanation of the topic -- particularly as it is relevant to students of mathematical problem solving.
On What makes AoPSWiki different: 'Other web resources... are written on the level of professional mathematicians.'
Since I've never really seen Bijection/Injection/Surjection show up as anything but useful terminology, I wasn't sure if they'd be in line with what was on those pages, since I definitely got the impression that the wiki's main goal was to be an accessible problem solving resource [I'm fine going in any direction (dictionary, problem solving, or both), myself]. ~eyefragment
I'm happy defining those terms there, but I agree that there's not a whole lot to do with them outside of giving examples.