Difference between revisions of "Fundamental Theorem of Sato"
m (Reverted edits by Fruitmonster97 (talk) to last revision by Chickenagent2227- -) (Tag: Rollback) |
m (Your spelling error is fixed :D) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Proof: | Proof: | ||
| − | Method 1: Proof by | + | Method 1: Proof by Contradiction |
Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing. | Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing. | ||
Revision as of 21:50, 20 August 2019
The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:
Sato is amazing.
Proof:
Method 1: Proof by Contradiction
Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.
This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 2: Proof by Authority
Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole
There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't (in this case, Sato goes in the unamazing pigeonhole). Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
