Difference between revisions of "2011 AMC 10B Problems/Problem 24"
(→Solution 4) |
(→Solution 4) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Notice that for <math>y=\frac{1}{2}x+2=\frac{50}{100}x+2</math>, <math>x=99</math> is one of the integral values of <math>x</math> such that the value of <math>\frac{50}{100}x</math> is the closest to its next lattice point, or the next integral value of <math>y</math>. | Notice that for <math>y=\frac{1}{2}x+2=\frac{50}{100}x+2</math>, <math>x=99</math> is one of the integral values of <math>x</math> such that the value of <math>\frac{50}{100}x</math> is the closest to its next lattice point, or the next integral value of <math>y</math>. | ||
+ | |||
Thus the maximum value for <math>a</math> is the value of <math>m</math> when the equation <math>y=99m+2</math> goes through its next lattice point, which occurs when <math>m=\frac{b}{99}</math> for some positive integer <math>b</math>. | Thus the maximum value for <math>a</math> is the value of <math>m</math> when the equation <math>y=99m+2</math> goes through its next lattice point, which occurs when <math>m=\frac{b}{99}</math> for some positive integer <math>b</math>. | ||
+ | |||
Finding the common denominator, we have <cmath>\frac{50}{100}=\frac{4950}{9900}, \frac{b}{99}=\frac{100b}{9900}</cmath> Since <math>a>\frac{1}{2}</math>, the smallest value for <math>b</math> such that <math>100b>4950</math> is <math>b=50</math>. | Finding the common denominator, we have <cmath>\frac{50}{100}=\frac{4950}{9900}, \frac{b}{99}=\frac{100b}{9900}</cmath> Since <math>a>\frac{1}{2}</math>, the smallest value for <math>b</math> such that <math>100b>4950</math> is <math>b=50</math>. | ||
− | Thus the maximum value of <math>a</math> is | + | |
+ | Thus the maximum value of <math>a</math> is <math>\frac{50}{99}.\boxed{mathrm{(B)}}</math> |
Revision as of 12:21, 6 August 2019
Problem
A lattice point in an -coordinate system is any point
where both
and
are integers. The graph of
passes through no lattice point with
for all
such that
. What is the maximum possible value of
?
Solution 1
For to not pass through any lattice points with
is the same as saying that
for
, or in other words,
is not expressible as a ratio of positive integers
with
. Hence the maximum possible value of
is the first real number after
that is so expressible.
For each , the smallest multiple of
which exceeds
is
respectively, and the smallest of these is
.
Solution 2
We see that for the graph of to not pass through any lattice points, the denominator of
must be greater than
, or else it would be canceled by some
which would make
an integer. By using common denominators, we find that the order of the fractions from smallest to largest is
. We can see that when
,
would be an integer, so therefore any fraction greater than
would not work, as substituting our fraction
for
would produce an integer for
. So now we are left with only
and
. But since
and
, we can be absolutely certain that there isn't a number between
and
that can reduce to a fraction whose denominator is less than or equal to
. Since we are looking for the maximum value of
, we take the larger of
and
, which is
.
Solution 3
We want to find the smallest such that there will be an integral solution to
with
. We first test A, but since the denominator has a
,
must be a nonzero multiple of
, but it then will be greater than
. We then test B.
yields the solution
which satisfies
. Checking the answer choices, we know that the smallest possible
must be
Solution 4
Notice that for ,
is one of the integral values of
such that the value of
is the closest to its next lattice point, or the next integral value of
.
Thus the maximum value for is the value of
when the equation
goes through its next lattice point, which occurs when
for some positive integer
.
Finding the common denominator, we have Since
, the smallest value for
such that
is
.
Thus the maximum value of is