Difference between revisions of "Distributive property"

 
m
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
Also note that there is no particular reason that distributivity should be one-way, as it is with conventional multiplication and addition.  For example, in a [[distributive lattice]], each of the operations [[meet]] and [[join]] distributes over the other.
 
Also note that there is no particular reason that distributivity should be one-way, as it is with conventional multiplication and addition.  For example, in a [[distributive lattice]], each of the operations [[meet]] and [[join]] distributes over the other.
 +
 +
 +
{{stub}}

Revision as of 17:56, 12 October 2006

Given two binary operations, $\times$ and $+$, acting on a set $S$, we say that $\times$ has the distributive property over $+$ (or $\times$ distributes over $+$) if, for all $a, b, c \in S$ we have

$a\times(b + c) = (a\times b) + (a \times c)$ and $(a + b) \times c = (a \times c) + (b \times c)$.

Note that if the operation $\times$ is commutative, these two conditions are the same, but if $\times$ does not commute then we could have operations which left-distribute but do not right-distribute, or vice-versa.


Also note that there is no particular reason that distributivity should be one-way, as it is with conventional multiplication and addition. For example, in a distributive lattice, each of the operations meet and join distributes over the other.


This article is a stub. Help us out by expanding it.