Art of Problem Solving
AoPS Online
Math texts, online classes, and more
for students in grades 5-12.
Visit AoPS Online ‚
Books for Grades 5-12 Online Courses
Beast Academy
Engaging math books and online learning
for students ages 6-13.
Visit Beast Academy ‚
Books for Ages 6-13 Beast Academy Online
AoPS Academy
Small live classes for advanced math
and language arts learners in grades 2-12.
Visit AoPS Academy ‚
Find a Physical Campus Visit the Virtual Campus

Difference between revisions of "2018 AMC 12A Problems/Problem 23"

(→‎Solution 3 (Nice, I Think?))
(→‎Solution 3 (Nice, I Think?))
Line 37: Line 37:
 
Let the bisector of <math>\angle ATP</math> intersect <math>PA</math> at <math>X.</math> We have <math>\angle ATX = \angle PTX = 44^{\circ},</math> so <math>\angle TXA = 80^{\circ}.</math> We claim that <math>MN</math> is parallel to this angle bisector, meaning that the acute angle formed by <math>MN</math> and <math>PA</math> is <math>80^{\circ},</math> meaning that the answer is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(E)}}</math>.
 
Let the bisector of <math>\angle ATP</math> intersect <math>PA</math> at <math>X.</math> We have <math>\angle ATX = \angle PTX = 44^{\circ},</math> so <math>\angle TXA = 80^{\circ}.</math> We claim that <math>MN</math> is parallel to this angle bisector, meaning that the acute angle formed by <math>MN</math> and <math>PA</math> is <math>80^{\circ},</math> meaning that the answer is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(E)}}</math>.
  
−
To prove this, let <math>N(x)</math> be the midpoint of <math>U(x)G(x),</math> where <math>U(x)</math> and <math>G(x)</math> are the points on <math>PT</math> and <math>AT,</math> respectively, such that <math>PU = AG = x.</math> (The points given in this problem correspond to <math>x=1,</math> but the idea we're getting at is that <math>x</math> will ultimately not matter.) Since <math>U(x)</math> and <math>G(x)</math> vary linearly with <math>x,</math> the locus of all points <math>N(x)</math> must be a line. Let <math>Y</math> be the intersection of this line with <math>PT</math> (we know that this line will intersect <math>PT</math> and not <math>AT</math> because <math>PT > AT</math>).
+
To prove this, let <math>N(x)</math> be the midpoint of <math>U(x)G(x),</math> where <math>U(x)</math> and <math>G(x)</math> are the points on <math>PT</math> and <math>AT,</math> respectively, such that <math>PU = AG = x.</math> (The points given in this problem correspond to <math>x=1,</math> but the idea we're getting at is that <math>x</math> will ultimately not matter.) Since <math>U(x)</math> and <math>G(x)</math> vary linearly with <math>x,</math> the locus of all points <math>N(x)</math> must be a line. Notice that <math>N(0) = M,</math> so <math>M</math> lies on this line. Let <math>N(x_0)</math> be the intersection of this line with <math>PT</math> (we know that this line will intersect <math>PT</math> and not <math>AT</math> because <math>PT > AT</math>). Notice that <math>G(x_0) = T.</math>
 +
 
 +
Let <math>AT = a, TP = b, PT = c.</math> Then <math>AG(x_0) = PU(x_0) = AT = a</math> and <math>PG(x_0) = PT = b.</math> Thus, <math>PN(x_0) = \frac{a+b}{2}.</math> By the Angle Bisector Theorem, <math>\frac{PX}{AX} = \frac{PT}{AT} = \frac{b}{a},</math> so <math>PX = \frac{bc}{a+b}.</math> Since <math>M</math> is the midpoint of <math>AP,</math> we also have <math>PM = \frac{c}{2}.</math> Notice that:
 +
 
 +
<cmath>\frac{PM}{PX} = \frac{\frac{c}{2}}{\frac{bc}{a+b}} = \frac{a+b}{2b}</cmath>
 +
<cmath>\frac{PN(x_0)}{PT} = \frac{\frac{a+b}{2}}{b} = \frac{a+b}{2b}</cmath>
 +
 
 +
Since <math>\frac{PN(x_0)}{PT} = \frac{PM}{PX},</math> the line containing all points <math>N(x)</math> must be parallel to <math>TX.</math> This concludes the proof.
  
 
The critical insight to finding this solution is that the length <math>1</math> probably shouldn't matter, because a length ratio of <math>1:5</math> or <math>1:10</math> (as in the problem) is exceedingly unlikely to generate nice angles. This realization then motivates the idea of looking at all points similar to <math>N,</math> which then leads to looking at the most convenient such point (in this case, the one that lies on <math>PT</math>).
 
The critical insight to finding this solution is that the length <math>1</math> probably shouldn't matter, because a length ratio of <math>1:5</math> or <math>1:10</math> (as in the problem) is exceedingly unlikely to generate nice angles. This realization then motivates the idea of looking at all points similar to <math>N,</math> which then leads to looking at the most convenient such point (in this case, the one that lies on <math>PT</math>).

Revision as of 23:59, 14 February 2018

Problem

In $\triangle PAT,$ $\angle P=36^{\circ},$ $\angle A=56^{\circ},$ and $PA=10.$ Points $U$ and $G$ lie on sides $\overline{TP}$ and $\overline{TA},$ respectively, so that $PU=AG=1.$ Let $M$ and $N$ be the midpoints of segments $\overline{PA}$ and $\overline{UG},$ respectively. What is the degree measure of the acute angle formed by lines $MN$ and $PA?$

$\textbf{(A)} 76 \qquad \textbf{(B)} 77 \qquad \textbf{(C)} 78 \qquad \textbf{(D)} 79 \qquad \textbf{(E)} 80$

Solution

Let $P$ be the origin, and $PA$ lie on the x axis.

We can find $U=\left(\cos(36), \sin(36)\right)$ and $G=\left(10-\cos(56), \sin(56)\right)$

Then, we have $M=(5, 0)$ and $N=\left(\frac{10+\cos(36)-\cos(56)}{2}, \frac{\sin(36)+\sin(56)}{2}\right)$

Notice that the tangent of our desired points is the the absolute difference between the y coordinates of the two points divided by the absolute difference between the x coordinates of the two points.

This evaluates to \[\frac{\sin(36)+\sin(56)}{\cos(36)-\cos(56)}\] Now, using sum to product identities, we have this equal to \[\frac{2\sin(46)\cos(10)}{-2\sin(46)\sin({-10})}=\frac{\sin(80)}{\cos(80)}=\tan(80)\] so the answer is $\boxed{\textbf{(E)}.}$ (lifeisgood03)

Solution 2 (Overkill)

Note that $X$, the midpoint of major arc $PA$ on $(PAT)$ is the Miquel Point of $PUAG$ (Because $PU = AG$). Then, since $1 = \frac{UN}{NG} = \frac{PM}{MA}$, this spiral similarity carries $M$ to $N$. Thus, we have $\triangle XMN \sim \triangle XAG$, so $\angle XMN = \angle XAG$.

But, we have $\angle XAG = \angle PAG = \angle PAX = 56 - \frac{180 - \angle PXA}{2} =56 - \frac{180 - \angle T}{2} = 56 - \frac{\angle A + \angle P}{2} = 56 - \frac{56+36}{2} = 56 - 46 = 10$; thus $\angle XMN = 10$.

Then, as $X$ is the midpoint of the major arc, it lies on the perpendicular bisector of $PA$, so $\angle XMA = 90$. Since we want the acute angle, we have $\angle NMA = \angle XMA - \angle XMN = 90 - 10 = 80$, so the answer is $\boxed{\textbf{(E)}}$.

(stronto)

Solution 3 (Nice, I Think?)

Let the bisector of $\angle ATP$ intersect $PA$ at $X.$ We have $\angle ATX = \angle PTX = 44^{\circ},$ so $\angle TXA = 80^{\circ}.$ We claim that $MN$ is parallel to this angle bisector, meaning that the acute angle formed by $MN$ and $PA$ is $80^{\circ},$ meaning that the answer is $\boxed{\textbf{(E)}}$.

To prove this, let $N(x)$ be the midpoint of $U(x)G(x),$ where $U(x)$ and $G(x)$ are the points on $PT$ and $AT,$ respectively, such that $PU = AG = x.$ (The points given in this problem correspond to $x=1,$ but the idea we're getting at is that $x$ will ultimately not matter.) Since $U(x)$ and $G(x)$ vary linearly with $x,$ the locus of all points $N(x)$ must be a line. Notice that $N(0) = M,$ so $M$ lies on this line. Let $N(x_0)$ be the intersection of this line with $PT$ (we know that this line will intersect $PT$ and not $AT$ because $PT > AT$). Notice that $G(x_0) = T.$

Let $AT = a, TP = b, PT = c.$ Then $AG(x_0) = PU(x_0) = AT = a$ and $PG(x_0) = PT = b.$ Thus, $PN(x_0) = \frac{a+b}{2}.$ By the Angle Bisector Theorem, $\frac{PX}{AX} = \frac{PT}{AT} = \frac{b}{a},$ so $PX = \frac{bc}{a+b}.$ Since $M$ is the midpoint of $AP,$ we also have $PM = \frac{c}{2}.$ Notice that:

\[\frac{PM}{PX} = \frac{\frac{c}{2}}{\frac{bc}{a+b}} = \frac{a+b}{2b}\] \[\frac{PN(x_0)}{PT} = \frac{\frac{a+b}{2}}{b} = \frac{a+b}{2b}\]

Since $\frac{PN(x_0)}{PT} = \frac{PM}{PX},$ the line containing all points $N(x)$ must be parallel to $TX.$ This concludes the proof.

The critical insight to finding this solution is that the length $1$ probably shouldn't matter, because a length ratio of $1:5$ or $1:10$ (as in the problem) is exceedingly unlikely to generate nice angles. This realization then motivates the idea of looking at all points similar to $N,$ which then leads to looking at the most convenient such point (in this case, the one that lies on $PT$).

(sujaykazi) Shoutout to Richard Yi and Mark Kong for working with me to discover the necessary insights to this problem!

See Also

2018 AMC 12A (Problems • Answer Key • Resources)
Preceded by
Problem 22 		Followed by
Problem 24
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25
All AMC 12 Problems and Solutions

The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions. AMC logo.png

Retrieved from "https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=2018_AMC_12A_Problems/Problem_23&oldid=91245"