Difference between revisions of "Operator inverse"
m |
m (proofreading) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
− | If our operation is not [[commutative]], we can talk separately about ''left inverses'' and ''right inverses''. A left inverse of g would be some h such that <math>G(h, g) = e</math> while a right inverse would be some h such that <math>G(g, h) = e</math>. | + | If our operation is not [[commutative]], we can talk separately about ''left inverses'' and ''right inverses''. A left inverse of g would be some h such that <math>G(h, g) = e</math>, while a right inverse would be some h such that <math>G(g, h) = e</math>. |
Revision as of 12:09, 18 July 2006
Suppose we have a binary operation G on a set S, , and suppose this operation has an identity e, so that for every we have . An inverse to g under this operation is an element such that .
Thus, informally, operating by g is the "opposite" of operating by g-inverse.
If our operation is not commutative, we can talk separately about left inverses and right inverses. A left inverse of g would be some h such that , while a right inverse would be some h such that .
Uniqueness (under appropriate conditions)
If the operation G is associative and an element has both a right and left inverse, these two inverses are equal.
Proof
Let g be the element with left inverse h and right inverse h', so . Then , by the properties of e. But by associativity, , so we do indeed have .
Corollary
If the operation G is associative, inverses are unique.