Difference between revisions of "Limit"
m (→Intuitive Meaning) |
(categories) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | For a [[Real numbers|real]] [[function]] <math> | + | For a [[Real numbers|real]] [[function]] <math>f(x)</math> and some value <math>c</math>, <math> \lim_{x\rightarrow c} f(x)</math> (said, "the limit of <math>f</math> at <math>x</math> as <math>x</math> goes to <math>c</math>) equals <math>L</math> [[iff]] for every <math>\epsilon > 0</math> there exists a <math>\delta </math> such that if <math>0<|x-c|<\delta</math>, then <math>|f(x)-L|< \epsilon</math>. |
==Intuitive Meaning== | ==Intuitive Meaning== | ||
− | The definition of a limit is a difficult thing to grasp, so many books give an intuitive definition first: a limit is the value to which the rest of the function grows closer. For example, <math> | + | The definition of a limit is a difficult thing to grasp, so many books give an intuitive definition first: a limit is the value to which the rest of the function grows closer. For example, <math>\lim_{x\rightarrow 2}x^2=4</math>, because as <math>x</math> grows arbitrarily close to 2 from either direction, the function <math>f(x)=x^2</math> grows arbitrarily close to 4. In this case, the limit of the function is exactly equal to the value of the function. That is, <math>\lim_{x\rightarrow c} f(x) = f(c)</math>. This is because the function we chose was a [[continuous function]]. Unfortunately, this does not hold true in general. For example, consider the function <math>f(x)</math> over the reals defined to be 0 if <math>x\neq 0</math> and 1 if <math>x=0</math>. Although the value of the function at 0 is 1, the limit <math>\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}f(x)</math> is, in fact, zero. Intuitively, this is because no matter how close we get to zero, as long as we never actually reach zero, <math>f(x)</math> will always be close to (in fact equal to) zero. Note that if our definition required only that <math>|x-c|<\delta</math>, the limit of this function would not exist. |
==Existence of Limits== | ==Existence of Limits== | ||
− | Limits do not always exist. For example <math> | + | Limits do not always exist. For example <math>\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{1}{x}</math> does not exist, since, in fact, there exists no <math>\epsilon</math> for which there exists <math>\delta</math> satisfying the definition's conditions, since <math>\left|\frac{1}{x}\right|</math> grows arbitrarily large as <math>x</math> approaches 0. However, it is possible for <math> \lim_{x\rightarrow c} f(x)</math> not to exist even when <math>f</math> is defined at <math>c</math>. For example, consider the Dirichlet function, <math>D(x)</math>, defined to be 0 when <math>x</math> is irrational, and 1 when <math>x</math> is rational. Here, <math>\lim_{x\rightarrow c}D(x)</math> does not exist for any value of <math>c</math>. Alternatively, limits can exist where a function is not defined, as for the function <math>f(x)</math> defined to be 1, but only for nonzero reals. Here, <math>\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}f(x)=1</math>, since for <math>x</math> arbitrarily close to 0, <math>f(x)=1</math>. |
==Small fraction of things to be added== | ==Small fraction of things to be added== | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
− | + | [[Category:Calculus]] | |
+ | [[Category:Definition]] |
Revision as of 20:19, 15 November 2007
For a real function and some value , (said, "the limit of at as goes to ) equals iff for every there exists a such that if , then .
Intuitive Meaning
The definition of a limit is a difficult thing to grasp, so many books give an intuitive definition first: a limit is the value to which the rest of the function grows closer. For example, , because as grows arbitrarily close to 2 from either direction, the function grows arbitrarily close to 4. In this case, the limit of the function is exactly equal to the value of the function. That is, . This is because the function we chose was a continuous function. Unfortunately, this does not hold true in general. For example, consider the function over the reals defined to be 0 if and 1 if . Although the value of the function at 0 is 1, the limit is, in fact, zero. Intuitively, this is because no matter how close we get to zero, as long as we never actually reach zero, will always be close to (in fact equal to) zero. Note that if our definition required only that , the limit of this function would not exist.
Existence of Limits
Limits do not always exist. For example does not exist, since, in fact, there exists no for which there exists satisfying the definition's conditions, since grows arbitrarily large as approaches 0. However, it is possible for not to exist even when is defined at . For example, consider the Dirichlet function, , defined to be 0 when is irrational, and 1 when is rational. Here, does not exist for any value of . Alternatively, limits can exist where a function is not defined, as for the function defined to be 1, but only for nonzero reals. Here, , since for arbitrarily close to 0, .
Small fraction of things to be added
- Limits can be added, subtracted, and mulitplied
- If a limit exists, it is unique
This article is a stub. Help us out by expanding it.