Difference between revisions of "2015 AIME II Problems/Problem 8"
(→Solution) |
(→Solution) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
To avoid the possibility that <math>a = 1</math>, we want to find values of <math>b</math> such that <math>\frac{3b - 2}{2b - 3} > 2</math>. If we do this, we will have that <math>a < \frac{3b - 2}{2b - 3} = k</math>, where <math>k</math> is greater than <math>2</math>, and this allows us to choose values of <math>a</math> greater than <math>1</math>. Again, since <math>b</math> is a positive integer, and we want <math>b > 1</math>, we can legitimately multiply both sides of <math>\frac{3b - 2}{2b - 3} > 2</math> by <math>2b - 3</math> to get <math>3b - 2 > 4b - 6 \implies b < 4</math>. For <math>b = 3</math>, we have that <math>a < \frac{7}{3}</math>, so the only possibility for <math>a</math> greater than <math>1</math> is obviously <math>2</math>. Plugging these values into <math>N</math>, we have that <math>N = \frac{8(27) + 1}{8 + 27} = \frac{217}{35} = \frac{31}{5}</math>. For <math>b = 2</math>, we have that <math>a < \frac{4}{1} = 4</math>. Plugging <math>a = 2</math> and <math>b = 3</math> in for <math>N</math> yields the same result of <math>\frac{31}{5}</math>, but plugging <math>a = 2</math> and <math>b = 2</math> into <math>N</math> yields that <math>N = \frac{8(8) + 1}{8 + 8} = \frac{65}{16}</math>. Clearly, <math>\frac{31}{5}</math> is the largest value we can have for <math>N</math>, so our answer is <math>31 + 5 = \boxed{036}</math>. | To avoid the possibility that <math>a = 1</math>, we want to find values of <math>b</math> such that <math>\frac{3b - 2}{2b - 3} > 2</math>. If we do this, we will have that <math>a < \frac{3b - 2}{2b - 3} = k</math>, where <math>k</math> is greater than <math>2</math>, and this allows us to choose values of <math>a</math> greater than <math>1</math>. Again, since <math>b</math> is a positive integer, and we want <math>b > 1</math>, we can legitimately multiply both sides of <math>\frac{3b - 2}{2b - 3} > 2</math> by <math>2b - 3</math> to get <math>3b - 2 > 4b - 6 \implies b < 4</math>. For <math>b = 3</math>, we have that <math>a < \frac{7}{3}</math>, so the only possibility for <math>a</math> greater than <math>1</math> is obviously <math>2</math>. Plugging these values into <math>N</math>, we have that <math>N = \frac{8(27) + 1}{8 + 27} = \frac{217}{35} = \frac{31}{5}</math>. For <math>b = 2</math>, we have that <math>a < \frac{4}{1} = 4</math>. Plugging <math>a = 2</math> and <math>b = 3</math> in for <math>N</math> yields the same result of <math>\frac{31}{5}</math>, but plugging <math>a = 2</math> and <math>b = 2</math> into <math>N</math> yields that <math>N = \frac{8(8) + 1}{8 + 8} = \frac{65}{16}</math>. Clearly, <math>\frac{31}{5}</math> is the largest value we can have for <math>N</math>, so our answer is <math>31 + 5 = \boxed{036}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 2 (Proof without words)== | ||
+ | <cmath>\frac{ab + 1}{a + b} < \frac{3}{2} \rightarrow 2ab + 2 < 3a + 3b,</cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath>\rightarrow 4ab - 6a - 6b + 4 < 0 \rightarrow (2a - 3)(2b - 3) < 5.</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>2a - 3</math>, <math>2b - 3 \in \{x \neq 2k, k \in Z \}; \rightarrow</math> | ||
+ | <cmath>(2a - 3)(2b - 3) = 1, 3 \rightarrow (2a - 3, 2b - 3) = (1, 1), (1, 3), (3, 1).</cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath>(a, b) = (2, 2), (2, 3), (3, 2).</cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath>\frac{a^3 b^3 + 1}{a^3 + b^3} = \frac{65}{16}, \frac{217}{35} = \frac{31}{5}.</cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath>\frac{31}{5} \rightarrow \boxed{36}.</cmath> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{AIME box|year=2015|n=II|num-b=7|num-a=9}} | {{AIME box|year=2015|n=II|num-b=7|num-a=9}} | ||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} |
Revision as of 17:16, 29 March 2015
Problem
Let and
be positive integers satisfying
. The maximum possible value of
is
, where
and
are relatively prime positive integers. Find
.
Solution
Let us call the quantity as
for convenience. Knowing that
and
are positive integers, we can legitimately rearrange the given inequality so that
is by itself, which makes it easier to determine the pairs of
that work. Doing so, we have
Now, observe that if
we have that
, regardless of the value of
. If
, we have the same result: that
, regardless of the value of
. Hence, we want to find pairs of positive integers
existing such that neither
nor
is equal to
, and that the conditions given in the problem are satisfied in order to check that the maximum value for
is not
.
To avoid the possibility that , we want to find values of
such that
. If we do this, we will have that
, where
is greater than
, and this allows us to choose values of
greater than
. Again, since
is a positive integer, and we want
, we can legitimately multiply both sides of
by
to get
. For
, we have that
, so the only possibility for
greater than
is obviously
. Plugging these values into
, we have that
. For
, we have that
. Plugging
and
in for
yields the same result of
, but plugging
and
into
yields that
. Clearly,
is the largest value we can have for
, so our answer is
.
Solution 2 (Proof without words)
,
See also
2015 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 7 |
Followed by Problem 9 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.