Art of Problem Solving
AoPS Online
Math texts, online classes, and more
for students in grades 5-12.
Visit AoPS Online ‚
Books for Grades 5-12 Online Courses
Beast Academy
Engaging math books and online learning
for students ages 6-13.
Visit Beast Academy ‚
Books for Ages 6-13 Beast Academy Online
AoPS Academy
Small live classes for advanced math
and language arts learners in grades 2-12.
Visit AoPS Academy ‚
Find a Physical Campus Visit the Virtual Campus

Difference between revisions of "2006 USAMO Problems/Problem 2"

m (→‎Problem)
m (→‎Solution)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
== Solution ==
 
== Solution ==
  
 +
=== Solution 1 ===
 
Let one optimal set of integers be <math>\{a_1,\dots,a_{2k+1}\}</math> with <math>a_1 > a_2 > \cdots > a_{2k+1} > 0</math>.
 
Let one optimal set of integers be <math>\{a_1,\dots,a_{2k+1}\}</math> with <math>a_1 > a_2 > \cdots > a_{2k+1} > 0</math>.
  
Line 32: Line 33:
  
 
Hence the smallest possible <math>N</math> is <math>\boxed{ N = 2k^3 + 3k^2 + 3k }</math>.
 
Hence the smallest possible <math>N</math> is <math>\boxed{ N = 2k^3 + 3k^2 + 3k }</math>.
 +
 +
{{alternate solutions}}
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==

Revision as of 08:47, 5 August 2014

Problem

(Dick Gibbs) For a given positive integer $k$ find, in terms of $k$, the minimum value of $N$ for which there is a set of $2k+1$ distinct positive integers that has sum greater than $N$ but every subset of size $k$ has sum at most $N/2$.

Solution

Solution 1

Let one optimal set of integers be $\{a_1,\dots,a_{2k+1}\}$ with $a_1 > a_2 > \cdots > a_{2k+1} > 0$.

The two conditions can now be rewritten as $a_1+\cdots + a_k \leq N/2$ and $a_1+\cdots +a_{2k+1} > N$. Subtracting, we get that $a_{k+1}+\cdots + a_{2k+1} > N/2$, and hence $a_{k+1}+\cdots + a_{2k+1} > a_1+\cdots + a_k$. In words, the sum of the $k+1$ smallest numbers must exceed the sum of the $k$ largest ones.

Let $a_{k+1}=C$. As all the numbers are distinct integers, we must have $\forall i \in\{1,\dots,k\}:~ a_{k+1-i} \geq C+i$, and also $\forall i \in\{1,\dots,k\}:~ a_{k+1+i} \leq C-i$.

Thus we get that $a_1+\cdots + a_k \geq kC + \dfrac{k(k+1)}2$, and $a_{k+1}+\cdots + a_{2k+1} \leq (k+1)C - \dfrac{k(k+1)}2$.

As we want the second sum to be larger, clearly we must have $(k+1)C - \dfrac{k(k+1)}2 > kC + \dfrac{k(k+1)}2$. This simplifies to $C > k(k+1)$.

Hence we get that:

\begin{align*} N & \geq 2(a_1+\cdots + a_k) \\ & \geq 2\left( kC + \dfrac{k(k+1)}2 \right) \\ & = 2kC + k(k+1) \\ & \geq 2k(k^2+k+1) + k(k+1) \\ & = 2k^3 + 3k^2 + 3k \end{align*}

On the other hand, for the set $\{ k^2+k+1+i ~|~ i\in\{-k,\dots,k\} \, \}$ the sum of the largest $k$ elements is exactly $k^3 + k^2 + k + \dfrac{k(k+1)}2$, and the sum of the entire set is $(k^2+k+1)(2k+1) = 2k^3 + 3k^2 + 3k + 1$, which is more than twice the sum of the largest set.

Hence the smallest possible $N$ is $\boxed{ N = 2k^3 + 3k^2 + 3k }$.

Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.

See also

  • <url>viewtopic.php?t=84550 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks</url>
2006 USAMO (Problems • Resources)
Preceded by
Problem 1 		Followed by
Problem 3
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6
All USAMO Problems and Solutions

The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions. AMC logo.png

Retrieved from "https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=2006_USAMO_Problems/Problem_2&oldid=62735"