Difference between revisions of "2014 USAJMO Problems/Problem 6"
Jettywang828 (talk | contribs) |
(→Solution) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
'''Extra karma will be awarded to the benefactor who so kindly provides a diagram and additional LATEX for this solution. Before then, please peruse your own diagram.''' | '''Extra karma will be awarded to the benefactor who so kindly provides a diagram and additional LATEX for this solution. Before then, please peruse your own diagram.''' | ||
− | We will first prove part (a) via contradiction: assume that line <math>IC</math> intersects line <math>MP</math> at Q and line <math>EF</math> and R, with R and Q not equal to V. Let x = <A/2 = <IAE and y = <C/2 = <ICA. We know that <math>MP | + | <center> |
+ | <asy> | ||
+ | unitsize(5cm); | ||
+ | import olympiad; | ||
+ | pair A, B, C, I, M, N, P, E, F, U, V, X, R; | ||
+ | A = dir(190); | ||
+ | B = dir(120); | ||
+ | C = dir(350); | ||
+ | I = incenter(A, B, C); | ||
+ | |||
+ | label("$A$", A, W); | ||
+ | label("$B$", B, dir(90)); | ||
+ | label("$C$", C, dir(0)); | ||
+ | |||
+ | dot(I); label("$I$", I, SSE); | ||
+ | draw(A--B--C--cycle); | ||
+ | |||
+ | real r, R; | ||
+ | r = inradius(A, B, C); | ||
+ | R = circumradius(A, B, C); | ||
+ | |||
+ | path G, g; | ||
+ | G = circumcircle(A, B, C); | ||
+ | g = incircle(A, B, C); | ||
+ | |||
+ | draw(G); draw(g); | ||
+ | label("$\Gamma$", dir(35), dir(35)); | ||
+ | label("$\gamma$", 2/3 * dir(125)); | ||
+ | |||
+ | M = (B+C)/2; | ||
+ | N = (A+C)/2; | ||
+ | P = (A+B)/2; | ||
+ | |||
+ | label("$M$", M, NE); | ||
+ | label("$N$", N, SE); | ||
+ | label("$P$", P, W); | ||
+ | |||
+ | E = tangent(A, I, r, 1); | ||
+ | F = tangent(A, I, r, 2); | ||
+ | |||
+ | label("$E$", E, SW); | ||
+ | label("$F$", F, WNW); | ||
+ | |||
+ | U = extension(E, F, M, N); | ||
+ | V = intersectionpoint(P--M, F--E); | ||
+ | |||
+ | label("$U$", U, S); | ||
+ | label("$V$", V, NE); | ||
+ | |||
+ | draw(P--M--U--F); | ||
+ | |||
+ | X = dir(235); | ||
+ | label("$X$", X, dir(235)); | ||
+ | |||
+ | draw(X--I, dashed); | ||
+ | draw(C--V, dashed); | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </asy></center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | We will first prove part (a) via contradiction: assume that line <math>IC</math> intersects line <math>MP</math> at Q and line <math>EF</math> and R, with R and Q not equal to V. Let x = <A/2 = <IAE and y = <C/2 = <ICA. We know that <math>\overline{MP} \parallel \overline{AC}</math> because <math>MP</math> is a midsegment of triangle <math>ABC</math>; thus, by alternate interior angles (A.I.A) <math>\angle MVE = \angle FEA = (180^\circ - 2x) / 2 = 90^\circ - x</math>, because triangle <math>AFE</math> is isosceles. Also by A.I.A, <MQC = <QCA = y. Furthermore, because <math>AI</math> is an angle bisector of triangle <math>AFE</math>, it is also an altitude of the triangle; combining this with <QIA = x + y from the Exterior Angle Theorem gives <math>\angle FRC = 90 - x - y</math>. Also, <math>\angle VRQ = \angle FRC = 90 - x - y</math> because they are vertical angles. This completes part (a). | ||
Now, we attempt part (b). Using a similar argument to part (a), point U lies on line <math>BI</math>. Because <MVC = <VCA = <MCV, triangle <math>VMC</math> is isosceles. Similarly, triangle <math>BMU</math> is isosceles, from which we derive that VM = MC = MB = MU. Hence, triangle <math>VUM</math> is isosceles. | Now, we attempt part (b). Using a similar argument to part (a), point U lies on line <math>BI</math>. Because <MVC = <VCA = <MCV, triangle <math>VMC</math> is isosceles. Similarly, triangle <math>BMU</math> is isosceles, from which we derive that VM = MC = MB = MU. Hence, triangle <math>VUM</math> is isosceles. | ||
− | Note that X lies on both the circumcircle and the perpendicular bisector of segment <math>BC</math>. Let D be the midpoint of <math>UV</math>; our goal is to prove that points X, D, and I are collinear, which equates to proving X lies on ray <math>ID</math>. | + | Note that X lies on both the circumcircle and the perpendicular bisector of segment <math>BC</math>. Let D be the midpoint of <math>UV</math>; our goal is to prove that points X, D, and I are collinear, which equates to proving <math>X</math> lies on ray <math>ID</math>. |
− | Because <math>MD</math> is also an altitude of triangle <math>MVU</math>, and <math>MD</math> and <math>IA</math> are both perpendicular to <math>EF</math>, <math>MD | + | Because <math>MD</math> is also an altitude of triangle <math>MVU</math>, and <math>MD</math> and <math>IA</math> are both perpendicular to <math>EF</math>, <math>\overline{MD} \parallel \overline{IA}</math>. Furthermore, we have <math>\angle VMD = \angle UMD = x</math> because <math>APMN</math> is a parallelogram. |
Revision as of 22:35, 30 November 2014
Problem
Let be a triangle with incenter , incircle and circumcircle . Let be the midpoints of sides , , and let be the tangency points of with and , respectively. Let be the intersections of line with line and line , respectively, and let be the midpoint of arc of .
(a) Prove that lies on ray .
(b) Prove that line bisects .
Solution
Extra karma will be awarded to the benefactor who so kindly provides a diagram and additional LATEX for this solution. Before then, please peruse your own diagram.
We will first prove part (a) via contradiction: assume that line intersects line at Q and line and R, with R and Q not equal to V. Let x = <A/2 = <IAE and y = <C/2 = <ICA. We know that because is a midsegment of triangle ; thus, by alternate interior angles (A.I.A) , because triangle is isosceles. Also by A.I.A, <MQC = <QCA = y. Furthermore, because is an angle bisector of triangle , it is also an altitude of the triangle; combining this with <QIA = x + y from the Exterior Angle Theorem gives . Also, because they are vertical angles. This completes part (a).
Now, we attempt part (b). Using a similar argument to part (a), point U lies on line . Because <MVC = <VCA = <MCV, triangle is isosceles. Similarly, triangle is isosceles, from which we derive that VM = MC = MB = MU. Hence, triangle is isosceles.
Note that X lies on both the circumcircle and the perpendicular bisector of segment . Let D be the midpoint of ; our goal is to prove that points X, D, and I are collinear, which equates to proving lies on ray .
Because is also an altitude of triangle , and and are both perpendicular to , . Furthermore, we have because is a parallelogram.