Difference between revisions of "2002 AIME I Problems/Problem 4"
(→Solution) |
(→Solution) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<math>\frac{29t}{t+1} = m</math> | <math>\frac{29t}{t+1} = m</math> | ||
− | Since | + | Since m is an integer, <math>t+1 = 29</math>, or <math>t=28</math>. It quickly follows that <math>n=29(28)</math> and <math>m=28</math>, so <math>m+n = 30(28) = \fbox{840}</math>. |
*If <math>m=29t</math>, a similar argument to the one above implies <math>m=29(28)</math> and <math>m=28</math>, which implies <math>m>n</math>, which is impossible since <math>n-m>0</math>. | *If <math>m=29t</math>, a similar argument to the one above implies <math>m=29(28)</math> and <math>m=28</math>, which implies <math>m>n</math>, which is impossible since <math>n-m>0</math>. |
Revision as of 14:40, 5 March 2011
Problem
Consider the sequence defined by for . Given that , for positive integers and with , find .
Solution
. Thus,
Which is
Since we need a 29 in the denominator, let .* Substituting,
Since m is an integer, , or . It quickly follows that and , so .
- If , a similar argument to the one above implies and , which implies , which is impossible since .
See also
2002 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
Followed by Problem 5 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |