Difference between revisions of "Fermat's Little Theorem"
m (proofreading) |
m (proofreading) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
=== Corollary === | === Corollary === | ||
| − | A frequently used | + | A frequently used corollary of Fermat's little theorem is <math> a^p \equiv a \pmod {p}</math>. |
As you can see, it is derived by multipling both sides of the theorem by a. | As you can see, it is derived by multipling both sides of the theorem by a. | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<br><br><br> | <br><br><br> | ||
| − | Thus, <math>n</math> is divisible by three and leaves a remainder of four when divided by 5. It's obvious that <math>n>133</math> so the only possibilities are <math>n = 144</math> or <math>n = 174</math>. It quickly becomes apparent that 174 is much too large so <math>n</math> must be 144. | + | Thus, <math>n</math> is divisible by three and leaves a remainder of four when divided by 5. It's obvious that <math>n>133</math>, so the only possibilities are <math>n = 144</math> or <math>n = 174</math>. It quickly becomes apparent that 174 is much too large, so <math>n</math> must be 144. |
=== Credit === | === Credit === | ||
Revision as of 13:05, 26 June 2006
Fermat's Little Theorem is highly useful in number theory for simplifying computations in modular arithmetic (which students should study more at the introductory level if they have a hard time following the rest of this article).
Statement
If 
is an integer and 
is a prime number, then 
.
Note: This theorem is a special case of Euler's Totient Theorem.
Corollary
A frequently used corollary of Fermat's little theorem is 
.
As you can see, it is derived by multipling both sides of the theorem by a.
Sample Problem
One of Euler's conjectures was disproved in the 1960s by three American mathematicians when they showed there was a positive integer such that 
. Find the value of 
. (AIME 1989/9)
By Fermat's Little Theorem, we know 
is congruent to 
modulo 5. Hence,
Continuing, we examine the equation modulo 3,
Thus, is divisible by three and leaves a remainder of four when divided by 5. It's obvious that 
, so the only possibilities are 
or 
. It quickly becomes apparent that 174 is much too large, so must be 144.
Credit
This theorem is credited to Pierre de Fermat.
